Bitget pledges $10 million to empower women in Web3

Wiziin Earmarks $500K Pre-Seed Funding for Blockchain InvestmentWiziin, a Vietnamese startup specializing in venture investment management, has secured $500,000 in pre-seed funding, which it plans to use to accelerate its efforts in blockchain technology investment.Photo by Peter Nguyen on UnsplashBroad networkAt the heart of Wiziin’s primary objective — to bridge the divide between investors and founders — lies the firm’s blockchain-based platform. The Wiziin platform is specifically tailored to venture investors with a focus on digital assets.Wiziin is headed up by venture capitalist Tien Nguyen and serial entrepreneur Thong Dang. The firm was established in 2020, with a view towards playing a part in what it foresees as a revolution in investment dynamics, particularly within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region. The company’s network encompasses more than 200 investors and an array of over 5,000 raised-fund companies. The company believes that this positions it to become a transformative force in the investment landscape within the region.“The established norms of venture capital funding have long followed conventional methodologies,” commented Thong Dang, Wiziin Co-Founder. “This infusion of funding serves as a catalyst for our ongoing endeavors in emerging blockchain technology, with the ultimate aim of disrupting and revolutionizing the industry. Tokenization of assets and the integration of smart contracts will form the bedrock of our innovative approach to venture capital,” he added.Homerun.clubCentral to Wiziin’s trajectory is the development of an investment platform named “Homerun.club.” This platform is engineered to foster co-investment experiences within blockchain ecosystems for individual investors.Through the elimination of intermediaries, Wiziin is striving to democratize funding access, unleashing global empowerment for entrepreneurs and inviting a more diverse spectrum of investors.The universality of blockchain technology shatters geographical limitations, enabling start-ups like Wiziin to bring investors and entrepreneurs together from every corner of the globe. This holds profound potential for startups and investors situated in expanding markets, and markets that have historically been underserved by conventional approaches to venture capital funding and investment.“While our platform operates within a decentralized framework, the importance of user verification cannot be understated, serving as both a regulatory compliance measure and a safeguard for investor interests,” elaborated Thong Dang.Dang added: “In tandem, we’re actively seeking institutional funding in the upcoming months to further fortify the platform. This strategic step will usher in a collaborative fundraising endeavor between our project and its vibrant community, fostering mutual growth and resounding success.”DAOs and start-up fundingWiziin’s approach is just one element in the ongoing shift towards blockchain-based start-up finance innovation. Many in the crypto space have also put forward DAOs or decentralized autonomous organizations, as an agent for further disruption in this area.DAOs also leverage blockchain technology, and their use can be helpful in cutting conventional venture capital firms out of the enterprise funding process. Furthermore, they can be used to cut through unwieldy regulation relative to start-up funding.With the conventional approach to start-up finance, only accredited investors gain access to early-stage opportunities. Individual investors, regardless of their net worth, can participate in a DAO-based approach to financing. The approach facilitates broader inclusion while having the effect of increasing liquidity as well.

South Korea is expected to lift its prohibition on initial coin offerings (ICOs), permitting companies to raise funds through digital token sales for the first time since 2017. The move would mark a reversal of the country’s strict regulatory stance, which was originally implemented to curb speculation and protect investors. Regulators had imposed the blanket ban citing a proliferation of projects with unclear fundamentals, fraud, and a lack of safeguards. Authorities at the time noted that unlike initial public offerings (IPOs)—which price shares based on corporate earnings and growth potential—ICOs lacked established standards for valuing the tokens themselves, making them difficult to assess.Photo by micheile henderson on UnsplashICO limited to qualified issuersAccording to a report by Newsis, the government is preparing to allow token issuance but will restrict eligibility to corporations that meet specific thresholds. Issuers would be required to submit documentation, including white papers, to financial authorities in advance and ensure these materials are available to investors. These requirements are expected to be codified in the Digital Asset Basic Act, a second-phase crypto bill currently under preparation. The report noted that the legislation aims to protect users and mitigate market risks by clearly defining accountability for potential failures. An official from the financial regulator stated that detailed criteria, such as minimum capital requirements, would be outlined in enforcement decrees after the bill is passed. Under the proposed rules, companies would be required to file a disclosure document with financial regulators. The requirement would mirror securities filings, but with a focus on public disclosure rather than regulatory approval. The Financial Services Commission would receive the filings, while the Financial Supervisory Service would examine them. Officials are also discussing measures to hold issuing companies fully liable should problems arise after issuance, reflecting the practical challenges involved in verifying the technical aspects of token projects in advance. The regulatory shift would allow South Korean companies to issue tokens at home instead of routing offerings through jurisdictions such as Singapore or Hong Kong. Until now, Korea-based issuers have typically set up overseas entities to conduct ICOs before seeking listings on domestic exchanges. The change is expected to encourage projects that previously went offshore to return to Korea. An industry official said the return of domestic token issuance would help tech companies raise early-stage funding at home and support the launch of new businesses. The move would also intensify competition among exchanges to attract promising projects, the official said, potentially broadening product offerings and lifting trading volumes. Japan plans ETFs, industry seeks faster rolloutAs South Korea moves to allow token issuance, Japan is also easing digital asset rules, though the industry has flagged the slow pace of change. According to local media reports, Japan’s Financial Services Agency plans to revise rules governing investment trusts to allow the inclusion of digital assets. This change would pave the way for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking spot crypto prices as early as 2028. Asset managers are already preparing for the shift. A Nikkei survey showed that as of last November, major firms, including Nomura Asset Management, SBI Global Asset Management, Daiwa, Asset Management One, Amova, and Mitsubishi UFJ, were considering the development of crypto-related investment trusts. However, the timeline has faced pushback. Tomoya Asakura, chief executive of SBI Global Asset Management, said on X that allowing crypto ETFs only from 2028 would be too slow for a country aiming to position itself as a global asset-management hub. He called for a faster rollout, arguing that such products could help channel household savings into investment. 

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”