Korean tech firms distance themselves from label 'blockchain' in rebranding efforts

Zipmex, the Asian digital asset exchange, faces another setback as the Securities and Exchange Commission Board of Thailand (SEC Board) moves to recommend the revocation of its digital asset business license. This decision, announced last week, marks the latest in a series of challenges for the exchange, which has struggled to navigate the complexities of the crypto market's downturn.Photo by Oleksandr P on PexelsCapital requirements failureThe SEC's recommendation stems from Zipmex's failure to meet the increased net capital requirement and address deficiencies in its personnel and management structure. These shortcomings were deemed unacceptable by the regulatory body, prompting a 15-day ultimatum issued on Feb. 1. Earlier this month, the Commission ordered a halt to Zipmex operations, enforcing a temporary suspension until such time as the company had improved its financial position and applied needed changes to its management structure.Despite this window for compliance, Zipmex fell short of meeting the specified conditions, leading to the current proposal for license revocation and the imposition of stringent regulatory measures on Thailand's digital asset exchanges. Business suspension extensionDuring a meeting on Feb. 21, the SEC further resolved to extend Zipmex's business suspension, initiated on Feb. 1, and allowed clients to request asset returns on the exchange until March 11. Any unclaimed assets after this date will be required to be placed in a "trusted and secured system," with Zipmex obligated to report this to the SEC. Notably, even after the potential revocation of its license, Zipmex will retain its status as a limited company, subject to associated rights, responsibilities and liabilities, including the possibility of legal action. Zipmex's woes trace back to 2022 when it faced significant challenges due to exposure to failed crypto lender Babel Finance. In July of that year, the exchange suspended withdrawals for weeks due to concerns over its ties to crypto lenders Babel and Celsius, both facing financial distress. Although access to Trade Wallets was restored after three days, Z Wallets remained inaccessible into the following year. Failed Coinbase and V Ventures dealsIn the midst of its troubles, Zipmex attracted interest from Coinbase, albeit without success. While Coinbase made a strategic investment in Zipmex, the acquisition attempt did not materialize as initially intended. Furthermore, Zipmex's financial struggles led it to file for debt relief in Singapore in July 2022, further complicating its position in the market. The exchange's regulatory challenges continued as it faced scrutiny from the SEC regarding compliance with the Digital Assets Act. Despite attempts to secure acquisition deals, such as the proposed acquisition by Thai investor V Ventures, Zipmex has been unable to alleviate regulatory concerns or stabilize its operations effectively. Since obtaining its license from the SEC in January 2020, Zipmex has operated in Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore and Australia. However, its inability to address regulatory requirements and financial challenges has cast doubt on its future viability in these markets.  In November of last year, the company itself announced a temporary cessation of trading in Thailand while it worked towards becoming compliant within that jurisdiction. Earlier this month, Thailand’s SEC took legal action against Akarlap Yimwilai, the former CEO of Zipmex Thailand.

An analysis of data recently published as part of Chainalysis’ Global Cryptocurrency Adoption Index demonstrates that Hong Kong has recorded a year-on-year crypto transaction value growth rate of 85.6%.  On that basis, the territory accounts for the sixth-largest crypto economy in the world. Furthermore, Hong Kong ranks 30th in terms of global crypto adoption. That’s an improvement of 17 places, as it was ranked 47th in 2023. Regulatory framework aiding crypto adoptionAn excerpt from the 2024 Geography of Cryptocurrency Report by Chainalysis was published on September 18. It found that the steps taken in the Chinese autonomous territory in terms of laying down a regulatory framework for digital assets has led to this uptick in transactional activity, due to the increased adoption of digital assets by institutions.  Over the course of the past eighteen months, Hong Kong has launched crypto trading licensing. Earlier this year, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) were given the green light, with the subsequent launch of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF products.  On the topic of ETF’s, Kevin Cui, CEO of digital asset trading platform OSL said that “as market conditions improve, we are seeing indications of a growing institutional interest that could lead to increased capital inflows in the near future.” Meanwhile, the Chinese autonomous territory is working towards the establishment of regulations that cover the issuance and trading of stablecoins.lil artsy on PexelsHong Kong key to Chinese crypto resurgenceIn terms of crypto adoption, mainland China ranked 11th this year, dropping down one place by comparison with last year. The report notes the complicated history China has had with cryptocurrency in recent years, given that a crypto trading ban remains in place. However, last year’s report pointed to the strong usage of centralized crypto exchanges by mainland China residents, which suggests that the ban has either been ineffective or poorly enforced.  The Chainalysis report speculates that “Hong Kong may finally influence China to re-open its doors to crypto.” This is not the first time that Chainalysis has made such an assertion. In last year’s report, it made a similar claim, suggesting that the development of Hong Kong as a crypto industry hub would lead to a softening in the stance of mainland China towards crypto. This year’s report suggests that mainland China residents have turned to over-the-counter (OTC) platforms in order to access crypto as a means towards preserving their wealth. The report quoted Ben Charoenwang, associate professor of finance at the INSEAD Asia Campus as stating: “Nowadays, if you want to move money out of China through traditional unofficial means like using mules, fees can be as high as 25 to 30 percent. The increasing use of OTC crypto in China suggests that people are looking for faster options to move money.” The report finds that five of the top 50 grassroots adopters of crypto, South Korea, China, Japan, Hong Kong and Taiwan, are located in East Asia. South Korea leads the region in terms of the most crypto value transacted metric. Chainalysis suggests that South Korea’s strong interest in altcoins signals that it will remain a leader in the region from a cryptocurrency innovation perspective.

Binance APAC Head Urges the Korean FIU to Approve Gopax’s Exec ChangesIn a recent interview with Yonhap News, Leon Sing Foong, Binance’s head of Asia-Pacific operations, emphasized the importance of the Korean financial regulator approving the change of executives at Gopax, a Korean crypto exchange.©Pexels/freestocks.orgDelayed staked asset returnFoong’s comments came in the face of mounting worries regarding the delayed repayment of assets stored in Gopax’s staking service GOFi. He explained that 25% of the assets staked in GOFi have been repaid, and the remaining assets will be refunded after approval of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) is secured.Foong was appointed as the new CEO of Gopax last February, with Binance becoming the largest shareholder of Gopax’s operator Streami. In March, Gopax submitted an application to the FIU to inform them of the executive changes, as required by Korean law.However, the application review has been delayed amid concerns about the unclear location of Binance’s headquarters and its regulatory challenges in the US.Controlling staking servicesThe Binance executive believes Gopax’s staking service should be controlled by the exchange itself, rather than a third party. The current GOFi issue emerged due to Gopax’s management of its custody assets through crypto lender Genesis, which ceased trading following the FTX bankruptcy. Foong stated that Binance will require Gopax to maintain reserves of over 100% and eventually phase out the third-party-based service.According to Foong, Gopax’s business model will remain unchanged, and the exchange will work alongside Binance to bolster liquidity within the local market while enhancing both infrastructure and security measures. He considers internal risk management as Gopax’s top priority.Risk assessmentFoong also expressed confidence in the upcoming risk assessment of Gopax by Jeonbuk Bank, recently requested by the Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). He said that the exchange is healthy, and that Binance has high-level anti-money-laundering (AML) capabilities.Korean law mandates crypto exchanges supporting Korean won trading have real-name bank accounts, and Gopax receives such accounts from its partner Jeonbuk Bank.Binance’s Asian expansionBinance’s endeavor to enter the Korean market is part of its strategy to expand its presence in Asia. It was previously reported that Binance Japan will start its operations around June this year.