Korean tech firms distance themselves from label 'blockchain' in rebranding efforts

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced his resignation on Sept. 7, citing completed trade talks with the United States and growing dissent within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). While the political transition follows the party’s defeat in July’s upper house elections, Ishiba’s departure also creates uncertainty for Japan’s crypto and Web3 agenda, which he had championed. Just two weeks earlier, at the WebX2025 event, Ishiba pledged stronger state backing for Web3 initiatives, noting their potential for addressing Japan’s demographic challenges and driving long-term economic transformation. He highlighted token-based community governance pilots, integration of Web3 at the Osaka Expo, and a five-year startup growth plan centered on digital industries. His exit now raises questions about whether these priorities will carry the same weight under new leadership.Photo by taro ohtani on UnsplashLeadership contest brings policy uncertaintyPotential successors signal diverging approaches. As per a BeInCrypto report, former Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi, who topped an August Nikkei approval survey with 23% support, is regarded as favoring tighter oversight. Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi, in second place with 8%, has shown greater receptiveness toward digital assets. According to Bloomberg, Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato is also considered a contender. Earlier, he emphasized balancing investor protection with space for innovation, noting the rapid uptake of crypto among Japanese investors. The LDP is preparing for a leadership election on Oct. 4, with 295 lawmakers each casting one vote and an equal 295 votes allocated proportionally to the party’s 1.03 million members, for a total of 590 ballots. Until then, investors and industry players are watching for signals on whether Japan’s digital asset roadmap will remain a priority. Adoption advances beyond politicsBeyond politics, adoption is accelerating across Japan’s financial system. Japan Post Bank plans to tokenize deposits on a permissioned blockchain by 2026 using the DCJPY token developed by DeCurret DCP, a Mitsubishi UFJ–backed venture. With $1.29 trillion in deposits across 120 million accounts, the move could streamline settlement of tokenized securities. Corporate strategies are also shifting. Last month Tokyo-based game developer Gumi said it would acquire 2.5 billion yen ($17 million) worth of XRP between September 2025 and February 2026, following its earlier 1 billion yen ($6.8 million) Bitcoin purchase this year. The company described XRP as central to its expansion into international remittance and liquidity networks led by its largest shareholder, SBI Holdings. Japan’s crypto footprint abroad is growing as well. Coincheck, a leading exchange in Japan, is entering Europe through the acquisition of Aplo, a French-licensed digital asset brokerage. The deal follows Coincheck’s Nasdaq listing last year via its Netherlands-based holding company. 

The European Council has banned all transactions within the European Union (EU) involving the Russian Ruble-backed stablecoin A7A5, according to a press release published Oct. 23. The prohibition targets the stablecoin itself, its developer, its Kyrgyzstan-based issuer, and the operator of a platform that facilitates major A7A5 trades. The package also takes aim at Russian crypto exchanges.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashAdditional banking restrictionsThis measure is part of a broader set of economic sanctions against sectors the EU stated assist the Russian invasion of Ukraine, including energy, finance, and defense industries. As part of this financial clampdown, the EU will also impose a ban on five additional Russian lenders starting Nov. 12. One of those lenders, Alfa-Bank, recently began offering Bitcoin buying and selling services, according to an X post by journalist Pete Rizzo. The European body said the new crypto measures address Russia’s increasing use of digital assets to circumvent existing sanctions. Russian banks were cut off from the SWIFT international payment system in early 2022, following the onset of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Reports of Russia using cryptocurrency to finance malign activities have surfaced previously. Earlier this month, Sławomir Cenckiewicz, the head of the Polish National Security Bureau (BBN), told the Financial Times that Russia has employed crypto to finance attacks on EU countries. Cenckiewicz said that a network of agents recruited by Russia’s GRU military intelligence agency and uncovered in Poland in 2023 had been substantially funded with cryptocurrency. Reflecting this concern, lawmakers in Poland’s lower house approved a bill in September to strengthen national crypto oversight, a move also expected to help curb Russian funding channels. Cenckiewicz noted that Polish intelligence agencies are closely monitoring the legislation to prevent loopholes that allow foreign actors to support agents using digital assets. Russia’s evolving crypto policyThe EU’s action comes as Russia itself is attempting to refine its own cryptocurrency rules. According to the Moscow Times, Russia's central bank wants to limit cryptocurrency use strictly to cross-border payments within an experimental legal regime (ELR). The institution continues to reject recognition of cryptocurrency as a legal means of payment and has advocated banning its use for domestic payments and retail investment, while permitting trading only for high-net-worth individuals through licensed platforms. Russia’s finance ministry has expressed a more flexible view, pointing to the scale of crypto adoption among the public. Earlier this year, the central bank estimated that domestic crypto transactions exceeded 1 trillion rubles (about $12.4 billion) per month, and that as of March, wallets linked to Russian users held roughly 827 billion rubles (about $10.2 billion). The finance ministry and the central bank have agreed to tighten supervision of the crypto market, with officials expecting to finalize the new framework before the end of the year. 

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.