Top

OSL Executive: Crypto ETFs have challenge to overcome in Hong Kong

Markets·August 13, 2024, 7:30 AM

At the Foresight 2024 Hong Kong Summit on Aug. 11, Gary Tiu, director and head of regulatory affairs for OSL, a crypto market custodian, exchange and prime brokerage, outlined in a panel discussion that the crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) market in the Chinese autonomous territory is challenged insofar as it lacks market incentives.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/32f5289abb5692037a3e85f20e70503b.webp
Photo by Cecelia Chang on Unsplash

The intermediary problem

Tiu’s company hosted the event, alongside Foresight News and crypto publication The Block, who reported on Tiu’s comments. The OSL executive said that when it comes to funds and structured products in Hong Kong, there’s a “very rich layer of intermediaries— brokers, banks, private banks, retail banks, etc.” involved. Tiu explained that they make a lot of money from the distribution of such products, resulting in unlisted products being marketed far more effectively by comparison with listed products.

 

It’s against that backdrop of misaligned incentives that Tiu identifies challenges for crypto ETFs on the public markets in Hong Kong. He stated:

 

“So I think the incentive system in Hong Kong is one of the reasons why ETFs do have a bit of a hard time growing as a financial instrument.”

 

In the case of ETFs, the OSL executive explained that equity brokers take just a few basis points in commission, only about 1-2% of what they make on the sale of structured products.

 

Bias against Bitcoin and Ether

Tiu is also of the belief that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether have a reputational problem among Hong Kong’s investment community, stating:

 

“I think there is still a bit of a bias in the eyes of the regulators and also in the eyes of the financial institutions, that somehow bitcoin ETF is just this unique class of risk that you need to be extra cautious about.”

 

Chen Zhao, who heads up the digital assets section of Hong Kong-based independent financial advisory firm Fosun Wealth, chimed in with his own concerns. According to Zhao, the crypto ETF products currently marketed in Hong Kong are lacking in terms of the depth of dealers and brokers offering the products. Zhao explained that there are three main types of market participant active on the Hong Kong markets, namely western institutions, Hong Kong-based institutions and their counterparts from mainland China. 

 

Zhao stated:

 

“Chinese brokers and dealers, they’re not allowed or they choose not to deal with the product, and for the western financial institutions, they don’t have the necessity of dealing the products because they acquire more fees and incentives, and have easier access to the U.S. ETFs.”

 

While progress is far more modest by comparison with the U.S. market, the Hong Kong crypto ETF market continues to develop, with spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs setting a record trading volume last week. In the same week, Mox Bank, a subsidiary of British banking multinational Standard Chartered, launched trading services relative to spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF products in Hong Kong.

 

Last month, OSL CEO Patrick Pan, anticipated that an Ethereum ETF product that incorporated staking would launch in Hong Kong within six months. Many commentators have suggested that institutional interest in Ethereum ETFs will begin in earnest once a yield-producing staking product hits the market.



More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Feb 09, 2024

Settlement approved but sealed by judge in BlockFi-3AC case

A settlement agreement between failed crypto lender BlockFi and bankrupt Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) has received approval from a U.S. judge. However, the specifics of the settlement remain sealed, citing concerns raised by yet another failed crypto platform, FTX. Dispute resolvedDuring a hearing on Feb. 6, New Jersey Bankruptcy Court Judge Michael Kaplan resolved the dispute, which saw BlockFi claiming $129 million owed by 3AC, while the Singapore-based firm contended that BlockFi owed it $280 million. Judge Kaplan's decision to keep the settlement agreement sealed stemmed from a perspective that unsealing it would be counterintuitive. BlockFi had filed a motion to seal the settlement terms last month. The U.S. Trustee objected to the seal, asserting that the debtors hadn't provided sufficient justification for sealing the agreement.Photo by mk. s on UnsplashSensitive settlement termsBlockFi justified the need for confidentiality, citing the sensitive commercial nature of the terms, which could potentially impact ongoing litigation involving FTX. The approval of the settlement now paves the way for BlockFi to proceed with distributions from the lending estate to its 100,000 creditors, with the firm owing up to $10 billion. Central to the dispute were preferential payments, transactions made just before bankruptcy that could have given the recipient more than they would have received through court proceedings. The resolution of counterclaims between BlockFi and 3AC follows mediation ordered by Judge Kaplan in October, likely culminating from a two-day hearing starting on Jan. 5 aimed at resolving the matter conclusively. This settlement follows another agreement between 3AC and Genesis, settling $1 billion in claims by 3AC. The company filed for bankruptcy in July 2022, attributing the extreme fluctuations in cryptocurrency markets as the reason for its collapse. Projected 46% 3AC creditor recoveryAccording to a December report to creditors by Teneo, it's estimated that 3AC creditors will receive approximately 45.74% of their claims from the bankrupt estate. As of Dec. 18, 2023, 3AC's assets were valued at $1.16 billion, while recognized claims for distribution stood at $2.7 billion. In an ongoing effort to secure 3AC's assets, a British Virgin Islands (BVI) court froze $1 billion in assets belonging to 3AC's founders, amid the liquidation process. This move is part of a broader strategy to seek recoveries from the founders and Kelly Chen, wife of one of the co-founders. 154 claims totaling $3.4 billion were filed against the 3AC estate, with $200 million not admitted for distribution and $322 million rejected or expected to be rejected. Additionally, claims worth $76 million are currently under dispute. BlockFi, along with eight affiliates, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2022. The firm cited significant exposure, including obligations owed to BlockFi by FTX-linked hedge fund Alameda Research, assets on the FTX platform and an undrawn credit line from FTX. 3AC’s collapse in June 2022, followed by FTX's downfall, led to BlockFi's bankruptcy filing in late November 2022. In a separate development, OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims platform launched by 3AC co-founders Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, announced its cessation of operations, with plans to shut down by Feb. 14.  

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 30, 2024

Dubai regulator tightens crypto marketing rules

Dubai's regulator, the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA), has been ahead of the curve by comparison with its peers internationally in getting a crypto regulatory framework in place, and now it's moving to tweak those regulations further. In a press release published via ZAWYA on Sept. 26, VARA announced an update to its crypto regulations which specifically deals with marketing. Its addition of “Marketing Regulations for Virtual Assets and Related Activities 2024” applies to virtual asset service providers (VASPs) operating within the Emirate of Dubai. In tandem with the updated regulations, VARA has published a marketing guidance document to assist VASPs in abiding by the regulations, providing detailed instructions and outlining best practices in terms of the application of appropriate marketing activities. Photo by ZQ Lee on UnsplashMandatory disclaimerOne of the new requirements demanded by the regulator is that marketing content related to digital assets should incorporate a disclaimer outlining to investors that there are financial risks associated with digital assets. To that end, from October 1 onwards, VASPs are required to add the following disclaimer, prominently displayed, within product marketing material: “Virtual assets may lose their value in full or in part and are subject to extreme volatility.” In its guidance documentation, VARA has stipulated that any content which contains contradictory messaging or information provided to users in “small print” is not deemed to be acceptable. The rules apply to both licensed entities and any unlicensed entities that attempt to offer a service within the Emirate of Dubai.  Consumer protectionThe motivation behind the regulatory update is the protection of consumers through the prevention of the dissemination of misleading information. The regulator wants consumers to be well-informed about crypto products, such that they’re aware of both the risks and opportunities associated with digital assets. VARA has set out a schedule of fines, broken down by category, with fines of up to 10 million United Arab Emirates (UAE) dirhams (AED), around $2.7 million, applying for those who do not comply. Commenting on the updated regulations, VARA CEO Matthew White stated: “Our updated marketing regulations and the newly issued guidance document reflect our commitment to maintaining Dubai’s position as a global leader in digital finance. We believe that by providing clear and actionable guidance, we can help VASPs deliver their services responsibly, while fostering greater trust and transparency in the market." The Dubai regulator isn’t the only one to home in on the marketing approach taken by crypto service providers. Since October 2023, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has implemented new rules which specifically deal with the marketing of crypto products and services. Many crypto platforms found the new requirements too arduous to follow. Some withdrew from the market while others did so on a temporary basis while working towards becoming compliant. Within the European Union, the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation came into force in June 2023. Those regulations demand that crypto service providers provide information and conduct marketing activities in a clear, fair and non-misleading manner.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 28, 2023

Crypto Travel Rule solutions provider CODE obtains ISO/IEC 27001 certification

Crypto Travel Rule solutions provider CODE obtains ISO/IEC 27001 certificationCODE, a Travel Rule solutions provider and joint venture co-founded by Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb, Coinone and Korbit, announced on Tuesday (local time) that it has obtained ISO/IEC 27001 certification for information security management systems (ISMS).Photo by Scott Graham on UnsplashEnhanced cybersecurity and operational resilienceThe ISO/IEC 27001 is a standard by which companies can develop, implement, maintain and improve their ISMS to carry out robust risk management, cybersecurity and operational excellence as required by institutions like the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).“CODE will provide a service environment that encourages confidence in our corporate members and the overall market starting with the acquisition of this information security management system certification,” said Lee Sung-mi, CEO of CODE.Consecutive effortsAs a Travel Rule solutions provider, CODE has been ramping up efforts to strengthen its compliance and information security capabilities. The company’s ISO/IEC 27001 certification comes shortly after it obtained ISO 37301 certification from the Korea Compliance Initiative (KCI). ISO 37301 is a standard for compliance management systems (CMS) that assesses organizations based on their compliance with laws, regulations, codes of conduct and more to exercise good governance, transparency and accountability.

news
Loading