OKX launches in UAE with full operating license

Galaxia Metaverse, NFT Marketplace Pala Join Forces to Expand Blockchain EcosystemGalaxia Metaverse, a South Korean blockchain company, announced last Thursday a partnership with Pala, the largest non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace in the nation, according to a report by gaming media outlet Kyunghyang Games. The collaboration aims to foster various initiatives, including the integration of blockchain wallets and the exploration of web3 business opportunities.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashAccess to Pala’s servicesPala offers a reliable secondary trading environment by verifying smart contracts for NFTs on Klaytn, Ethereum, and Polygon. This Korean NFT marketplace supports multiple digital wallets such as Klip, MetaMask, Kaikas Mobile, and D’CENT. As part of the agreement, Galaxia Metaverse’s Galaxia Wallet will also be supported by Pala, allowing users of the Galaxia Wallet to access Pala’s services.Galaxia Wallet, a user-friendly wallet, currently supports GXA, ETH, and KLAY, providing blockchain services related to NFTs and DeFi. The partnership with Pala is anticipated to strengthen Galaxia’s services and foster the expansion of the blockchain ecosystem.GXA-based economyGalaxia Metaverse aims to connect Galaxia Wallet with various external services to provide diverse user experiences, thereby expanding its blockchain platform. The company is dedicated to building a GXA-based economy that showcases Web3 projects.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”

Zipmex proposes creditor repayments of 3 cents on the dollarBeleaguered Singaporean crypto exchange Zipmex has unveiled a restructuring proposal aimed at repaying creditors. According to a report published by Bloomberg on Wednesday, the initial offer stands at 3.35 cents for every dollar of the creditors’ claims.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashRestructuring challengesThis restructuring proposal unfolds against the backdrop of a challenging period for Zipmex, triggered by the aftermath of last year’s crypto price downturn. The crypto exchange, which operates in Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and Singapore, is currently undergoing a court-supervised restructuring process based in Singapore.In its efforts to restructure the business, Zipmex is grappling with a debt of $97.1 million. That total debt level is contingent upon the eventual recovery of assets. Bloomberg cited sources familiar with the matter, suggesting that depending on the success of these recovery efforts, the repayment figure could potentially surge to 29.35 cents per dollar.Creditor dissatisfactionHowever, not all major creditors are on board with Zipmex’s proposed plan. Expressing reservations, they are pushing for an independent review to scrutinize recent changes in the company’s assets and liabilities, as outlined in an Oct. 4 court document. This external examination is deemed crucial to ensuring transparency and fairness throughout the restructuring process.In response to these developments, Marcus Lim, the Group Chief Executive Officer of Zipmex, refrained from providing detailed comments due to the confidentiality of the ongoing arrangement. While acknowledging inaccuracies in information sourced from external outlets, he chose not to elaborate on them further.Investor deal failureA previous attempt to sell Zipmex to V Ventures, a subsidiary of Thoresen Thai Agencies, fell through. To add to the struggling company’s woes, it emerged earlier this week that Thailand’s securities regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently instructed Zipmex to halt operations in the country due to insufficient net capital.The company had been fined 11 million baht ($315,000) by the SEC earlier this year. The SEC cited the co-mingling of corporate and customer funds as one regulatory breach. Furthermore, the Thai regulator claimed that between May and July 2022, Zipmex “did not have in place a system to effectively prevent conflicts of interest in such matters and the business operation does not have an adequate risk control system.”In response to this recent regulatory directive, Zipmex Limited issued a statement to its customers, expressing its commitment to ensuring proper and compliant business operations in line with the criteria set by the Thai SEC. Consequently, the temporary suspension of digital asset trading and deposit of all types was deemed necessary.The intricacies of Zipmex’s financial restructuring will be closely watched by market observers, especially considering the volatility in the crypto market and the regulatory challenges faced by the company in multiple jurisdictions. The success of the proposed repayment plan, contingent upon asset recovery, remains uncertain, leaving creditors and industry stakeholders on edge.As Zipmex grapples with these multifaceted challenges, its future trajectory hinges on navigating both the demands of the bankruptcy process alongside regulatory requirements.