Standard Chartered joins with local partners in Hong Kong to launch stablecoin

Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX AutopsySingaporean state-owned investment firm, Temasek Holdings, has announced a reduction in compensation for executives responsible for the company’s investment in the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Temasek, once the second-largest outside investor in FTX, faced scrutiny after the collapse of the exchange.Photo by Emilio Takas on UnsplashNo misconduct findingOn May 29, Temasek released a statement confirming the completion of its internal review of the $275 million investment loss incurred from FTX. The review determined that there was “no misconduct” within the company. However, both the investment team and senior management took “collective accountability” and experienced a reduction in their compensation.While acknowledging the inherent risks associated with any investment, Temasek emphasized the importance of continuing to invest in new sectors and emerging technologies to understand their potential impact on the business and financial models of existing portfolios. They recognized the need to adapt to an ever-changing world and explore avenues that could drive future value.It’s worth noting that the $275 million loss from the FTX investment constituted only 0.09% of Temasek’s portfolio value, which stood at over $293 billion at the time of the collapse.Temasek maintained that it conducted extensive due diligence before investing in FTX, emphasizing its commitment to a thorough review process. Chairman Lim Boon Heng stated in a May 29 interview with Bloomberg that there was fraudulent conduct intentionally hidden from investors, including Temasek. The negative outcome of the investment has been disappointing for the company and has had a significant impact on its reputation.Reputational damageSingapore Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the financial loss and reputational damage caused by the FTX collapse during a parliamentary meeting in November 2022.During the due diligence process, Temasek reviewed FTX’s financial statements, assessed regulatory risks related to financial service providers in the cryptocurrency market, and sought legal advice. The company also engaged with individuals who had firsthand knowledge of FTX, including employees, investors, and industry participants.In recent news, Temasek addressed and dismissed rumors about a $10 million investment in Array, a developer of algorithmic currency systems based on smart contracts and artificial intelligence. The company clarified that such reports were incorrect, refuting the circulating news articles and tweets.Temasek’s internal review process is certainly a move towards transparency and accountability. It indicates a willingness towards addressing the matter. That said, there are FTX creditor groups who fervently disagree with Temasek’s analysis.Class action lawsuitEarlier this year a number of FTX creditors filed a class action lawsuit against a number of venture capital (VC) firms, including Temasek. The FTX customers maintain that Temasek and others played a role in a conspiracy to defraud them. Venture capital firms have countered with the view that they themselves were victims as a consequence of the FTX collapse, suffering multi-million dollar losses.The fact remains that VCs get much further involved than merely handing over a check. They get involved with marketing, operations, and many other facets of the businesses of their portfolio companies. Meanwhile, other creditors suggest that Temasek has a responsibility to do right by the 1.4 million FTX creditors (a disproportionate number of them being Singapore-based) and to invest in a restructured FTX business, an option that represents the best opportunity for FTX customers to recover their funds.Temasek may have reached certain conclusions by way of their internal report on the matter but this is not likely to be the final analysis relative to its involvement in the fall of FTX.

India Launches Crypto-Enabled Web Browser InitiativeIn a further leap into the digital frontier, the Indian Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has unveiled the Indian Web Browser Development Challenge (IWBDC), signaling a significant move towards reducing the nation’s reliance on foreign technology.Photo by Julian Yu on UnsplashIndigenous web browserCentral to this ambitious initiative is the creation of an indigenous web browser with an innovative twist — the integration of cryptographic features for digitally signing documents. This advancement is poised to heighten the security and efficiency of online transactions, elevating India’s digital landscape.The launch event for the challenge took place at the India Habitat Centre and showcased a collaborative endeavor involving MeitY, Controller of Certifying Authorities (CCA), and the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC).Harnessing blockchain technologyAt its core, this initiative aims to bridge the traditional internet framework with the burgeoning potential of blockchain technology. A press release published by MeitY on Wednesday clarified that the web browser will boast an embedded CCA India root certificate, bolstering the browser’s security framework and upholding the sanctity of data privacy.Sunita Verma, Research & Development Group Coordinator at MeitY, underscored the profound significance of this initiative in India’s digital narrative. She conveyed the message from Alkesh Kumar Sharma, MeitY’s Secretary, emphasizing that this challenge embodies a pivotal stride toward realizing the vision of an “Aatmanirbhar Bharat” or self-reliant India.Further echoing this sentiment, Verma stated:“Digital India has orchestrated a transformative shift in our nation’s operational fabric. As we journey forward, the convergence of technology and homegrown innovation stands as a critical waypoint. More than just a browser, this is a symbol of a self-sufficient, digitally empowered India.”Progressive use caseIn line with the drive towards digital sovereignty, Arvind Kumar, MeitY’s CCA, illuminated the paramount significance of trustworthiness and security in the realm of digital interactions. He expressed his confidence that the forthcoming browser, fortified with the India Root Certificate, will render the nation more resilient against internet vulnerabilities, ultimately curbing dependence on foreign technology players.The IWBDC extends an open invitation to innovators across diverse domains, encompassing academia, industry, startups, and individuals, to contribute their ingenuity to this groundbreaking venture. The challenge brings with it a substantial prize pool of Rs. 3.41 crore ($0.4 million), offering not only financial incentives but also a chance to shape the trajectory of India’s digital future.While establishment agencies in India have largely been opposed to the legalization of cryptocurrencies, this initiative demonstrates that others are looking to exploit the blockchain and cryptocurrency innovation.While the Indian government has been active in calling for global crypto regulation, the country itself has not as yet finalized any such legislation relative to Web3 and cryptocurrency. Initiatives like this one help to showcase the possibilities that this innovation can bring about. That should serve to steer regulation in India towards a set of rules that enable the further development of that innovation.As the curtains rise on the Indian Web Browser Development Challenge, the world’s most populous nation is taking a decisive stride towards asserting its tech self-reliance, intertwining innovation with security, and laying the foundation for a digitally progressive India.

The Korea Association of Game Industry (K-GAMES) – the body responsible for overseeing and nurturing the country’s successful gaming industry – released its 2023 Global Game Policy and Legislation Study on Tuesday (KST) in collaboration with the Korea Creative Content Agency (KOCCA).Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashThe report summarizes gaming-related regulations and laws in six Western European countries – the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain and France – including those on standard terms and conditions, the protection of minors, personal privacy, payment and more. "Through cooperation between public and private sectors, we have been able to achieve tasks like collecting information and securing databases on overseas gaming markets by country and continent," said Kang Shin-chul, President of K-GAMES. "We will continue to contribute to the development of the domestic game industry," he added. Regulatory landscapeThe study found that operators in the specified countries are not required to obtain special licenses, appoint local representatives, or set up servers in order to operate a gaming business in their respective countries. It also details country-specific requirements, such as in Germany, where the use of content that glorifies or justifies Nazi-related symbols or actions is prohibited. A closer look at Belgium’s stanceInterestingly, the report revealed that the regulation of randomly distributed in-game items varied by country. The UK, Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and France have no legal restrictions on such items, but the UK and the Netherlands have recommended that information on the odds of winning them in games of chance should be disclosed before a player obtains or opens an item. Meanwhile, Belgium has implemented a regulation that prohibits paid games of chance for stochastic items altogether due to its laws regarding gambling. However, there are no regulations on Play-to-Earn (P2E) games unless they constitute gambling, which is also true of the other five countries. Minting game items into NFTs is also not subject to oversight in all six nations unless they are considered financial instruments. There are also no standard terms and conditions set by Belgium’s national government for gaming services, which are instead governed by the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).