Top

Hong Kong firms move forward with staking services

Policy & Regulation·April 14, 2025, 6:57 AM

With local regulator the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) having set out guidelines for crypto firms regarding the provision of crypto staking services, two prominent Hong Kong companies have moved forward with staking-related offerings.

 

HashKey Capital, a crypto-focused institutional asset manager, and crypto trading platform OSL, have announced the addition of staking to an Ether exchange-traded fund (ETF) and in the case of OSL, a partnership with Kiln to offer ETH staking.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/27778adcdbee077e0abfe4c4ea0cbe86.webp
Photo by Raymond Yeung on Unsplash

First spot crypto ETF in APAC to support staking

In a press release published on April 11, HashKey Capital outlined that its Bosera HashKey Ether ETF, which was jointly launched with Bosera Asset Management in April 2024, has received approval from the SFC to engage in Ethereum staking activity from April 25 onwards. 

 

HashKey claimed that its ETH ETF product is the first spot crypto ETF within the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region to support staking. The company stated:

 

“By enabling staking, the ETF aims to enhance potential returns for investors, creating a new avenue to participate in the Ethereum ecosystem through a regulated virtual asset investment vehicle.”

 

The staking service will be extended to the ETF by another HashKey Group company, HashKey Cloud, a Web3 infrastructure provider. HashKey Capital and HashKey OTC Global CEO Deng Chao said that the institutional-grade staking infrastructure of HashKey Cloud was being leveraged in order to provide a secure, efficient and regulated vehicle to access staking rewards with ease to both professional and retail investors. 

 

The ETF is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX). It tracks the price of Ether via the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate, a daily benchmark index price that aggregates Ether trade data from various sources.

 

Competitive edge

Both HashKey and the Hong Kong authorities have stolen a march on their international counterparts with the launch. In recent months, efforts have been building in the United States by spot ETH ETF providers to add a staking element to these offerings.

Robert Mitchnick, head of digital assets at the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, told last month’s Digital Asset Summit in New York that the lack of availability of a staking yield as part of U.S. spot ETH ETFs is likely to be holding the development of the products back. He added:

”A staking yield is a meaningful part of how you can generate investment return in this space, and all the [ether] ETFs at launch did not have staking.”

 

HashKey and OSL were the first two entities to be issued trading licenses by the regulator in Hong Kong. OSL is also looking to take advantage of the new regulatory clarity related to crypto staking in Hong Kong.

On April 10, it published a press release, outlining details of a partnership that it has formed with enterprise-grade staking infrastructure firm, Kiln. By integrating with Kiln’s API infrastructure, OSL is now enabled in offering clients of its custody platform access to staking services.

Kiln co-founder and CEO Laszlo Szabo underscored the significance of regulatory approval of staking in Hong Kong, while stating:

”With the future integration of staking, these products will offer investors both exposure to ETH price movements and rewards for securing the Ethereum network.”

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jul 27, 2023

KuCoin Dismisses Notion of a Layoff Plan

KuCoin Dismisses Notion of a Layoff PlanAmidst recent rumors of significant layoffs at Seychelles-based cryptocurrency exchange KuCoin, the company’s CEO has come forward to deny any such plans.While not refuting the possibility of staff reductions, KuCoin’s CEO, Johnny Lyu, took issue with the term “layoffs,” asserting that it was a reevaluation of the organization’s structure rather than job terminations. The speculations about staff cuts were first reported by Colin Wu of Wu Blockchain on Twitter.Photo by Joao Viegas on UnsplashAlleged 30% workforce reductionAccording to his sources, KuCoin was planning to layoff around 30% of its workforce, attributing the alleged measure to a strict know-your-customer (KYC) policy that had impacted the firm’s profits.The KYC policy in question was introduced after KuCoin faced legal action from the United States. In March, the New York Attorney General accused the exchange of violating securities and commodities laws, leading to the implementation of the more stringent KYC measures.Routine bi-annual appraisalsInstead, Lyu has clarified that any adjustments to the company’s headcount were a result of routine bi-annual appraisals aimed at maintaining competitiveness in the market.Taking to Twitter on Tuesday, Lyu referred to the layoff reports as “rumors.” He emphasized that the company regularly evaluates its organizational structure based on employee performance and overall company development to ensure dynamism and competitiveness.The Kucoin CEO pointed to a recent report issued by the company as evidence of the exchange’s ongoing growth. The report revealed that the firm had added 300 new employees in the first half of the year. It also mentioned that KuCoin was in the process of upgrading its KYC authentication systems to enhance user asset security, comply with global compliance requirements, and create a safer trading environment.Despite the speculation and policy changes, KuCoin ranks 11th in terms of “trust score” among other exchanges, according to CoinGecko. Over the past day, the exchange notched up an impressive $327 million in trading volume.KYC policy changeRecently, KuCoin updated its KYC policy, requiring newly registered users to complete the KYC process to access the exchange’s products and services. Existing registered users who had not completed KYC by the deadline faced restrictions on their accounts, limiting certain activities but allowing fund withdrawals.The update to the KYC policy had a notable impact on KuCoin’s trading volume. A day after the announcement, trading volume skyrocketed to $6.8 billion from the previous day’s $500 million, according to CoinGecko data.Lyu has pledged to continue investing in the company’s core businesses while providing users with the exceptional trading experience they’ve been promised.KuCoin may have dispelled rumors of widespread layoffs and clarified that any staff adjustments were part of routine organizational development. However, there’s no doubt that the crypto exchange business is going through a difficult period.Most exchanges have suffered due to regulatory pushback, particularly those that have focused their activities in the United States. Earlier this month, global exchange Binance cut 1,000 jobs with plans to make further cuts in the future.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 14, 2023

Terraform Labs Accuses Citadel Securities of Stablecoin Sabotage

Terraform Labs Accuses Citadel Securities of Stablecoin SabotageTerraform Labs, the bankrupt Singaporean blockchain firm, is pointing fingers at American market maker Citadel Securities, alleging that it played a role in an orchestrated effort to destabilize Terraform’s TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin back in May 2022.In its pursuit of justice, Terraform Labs has now called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to compel Citadel Securities to furnish vital documents concerning their trading activities during that critical period, when the stablecoin underwent a depegging crisis, now referred to as TerraUSD Classic (USTC).Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAllegations of intentional destabilizationThat’s according to a motion filed by Terraform in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, earlier this week. As alleged by Terraform Labs, the catastrophic depegging event in May 2022, which saw UST plummet from $1 to a mere $0.02, was not solely due to inherent instability in the algorithm supporting the UST stablecoin. Instead, the firm contends that it was a result of the deliberate and collaborative actions of specific third-party market participants who engaged in “shorting” to trigger the depegging.Terraform stated in its motion:“Movant [Terraform] contends that the market destabilization that occurred did not result from instability in the algorithm underlying the UST stablecoin. Instead, Movant contends that the market was destabilized due to the concerted, intentional effort of certain third party market participants to ‘short’ and cause UST to depeg from its one dollar price.”The motion also alludes to “publicly available evidence” hinting at Citadel’s intention to short the stablecoin at the time of the depegging event. In particular, it references a Discord channel chat screenshot where a pseudonymous trader purportedly had a conversation with Citadel head Ken Griffin. Griffin allegedly remarked:“They were going to Soros the f*** out of Luna UST,” seemingly drawing a connection to George Soros’ trading strategies, which often involve highly leveraged, one-way bets.Citadel refuted allegations previouslyNotably, Citadel Securities has previously refuted allegations of trading the TerraUSD stablecoin in May 2022, according to Forbes.In its motion, Terraform refers to the importance of these documents for its defense in a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February. The SEC lawsuit alleges that Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, played a significant role in orchestrating a multi-billion dollar cryptocurrency securities fraud.The motion concludes with Terraform arguing that its defense would be substantially hampered if Citadel Securities were to successfully withhold the requested information. In the event that the court fails to compel Citadel, Terraform has requested that the matter be transferred to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.The matter has been the subject of debate within the crypto community in recent months. In May a community member stated:“As I’ve been saying. People blamed Citadel et al. This was nothing but a rug pull. Wake up. Do Kwon says the dissolving of Terraform Labs in Korea days before the $LUNA and $UST crash is ‘purely coincidental.’”With the matter now being raised in the courts, it looks like the legal system will be the final adjudicator regarding the issue.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 15, 2024

Falcon Labs fined in settlement with CFTC

U.S. regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has fined Seychelles-headquartered crypto prime brokerage Falcon Labs as part of an overall settlement with the company.  The CFTC had found that the company had operated as an unregistered futures commission merchant (FCM) and furthermore, that it had enabled access to digital asset exchanges without the requisite registration.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on UnsplashSettlement termsIn a press release published to its website on May 13, the CFTC set out the nature of its settlement with Falcon Labs. The parties have agreed that Falcon Labs must discontinue its activities in acting as an unregistered FCM, with particular emphasis on it having provided U.S. individuals with access to digital asset derivatives trading.  Furthermore a fine of $1,179,008 has been applied in disgorgement and in addition, Falcon will have to pay a civil monetary penalty of $589,504. These penalties have been significantly reduced by comparison with the CFTCs original ask, on the basis that Falcon Labs cooperated fully with the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement over the course of the regulator’s investigative process into the activities of the company. In its statement the regulator set out its intent relative to enforcement going forward. Ian McGinley, the CFTC’s Director of Enforcement, stated:”The CFTC is taking the fight one step further by, for the first time, charging an intermediary that inappropriately facilitated access to those exchanges. Today’s action highlights that the CFTC will not hesitate to charge any entities—exchanges or intermediaries—who are providing customers access to digital asset products and services that require registration but have failed to appropriately register.” McGinley added that “the CFTC’s enforcement program has made clear it will not tolerate digital asset exchanges that fail to register with the CFTC or comply with the agency’s rules that maintain integrity in the derivatives markets.” No admission of guiltIn responding to the CFTCs original complaint, Falcon Labs tried to up the ante in terms of compliance. It moved to improve customer identification controls. As a consequence of its market position as a trading intermediary Falcon Labs enabled customer trading on a number of digital asset exchange platforms.  That activity included facilitating U.S.-based institutional customers relative to crypto derivatives trading. It allowed its own account with various digital asset trading platforms to be used, through a system of sub-accounts, by its customers, oftentimes without adequate customer information having been sought. In reaching this settlement with the CFTC Falcon Labs has not made any admission of guilt relative to the regulator’s findings. Alongside paying the agreed upon fines, it will voluntarily agree to adhere to the implementation of improved controls and to withhold its services from user groups that are deemed to be restricted, including all U.S. nationals. Taking to the X social media platform to comment on the matter, Mike Sellig, a partner at New York-based law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, claimed that the settlement demonstrated that the CFTC was following in the footsteps of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), establishing “a body of widely applicable precedent.”

news
Loading