Hong Kong moves towards stablecoin licenses as Shenzhen warns of stablecoin scams

Korean cryptocurrency exchange FOBLGATE (FOBL) last Thursday showcased its ongoing project on real estate-based security tokens at Momo Network’s second security token offering (STO) and Web3 networking party, the game media outlet Kyunghyang Games reported. Momo Networks is the company behind Momoboard, an all-in-one app that combines bulletin board, messaging and cloud storage features. The event served as an opportunity for FOBL to inform participants about the current stage of the exchange’s project and where it is headed. Initially introduced in November last year, the project is a collaboration between FOBL and prop fintech company Plus Platform, an asset management and trading platform headquartered in New York, U.S. Photo by Glenn Carstens-Peters on UnsplashReal estate-based security token projectAt the event, participants are anticipated to discuss the future of the security token market, which is currently focused on conventional real-world assets (RWAs). This new security token project is expected to innovate traditional real estate investments, offering benefits such as high liquidity, low transaction fees and easy access to investors, explained FOBL. The crypto company aims to solidify its position in the crypto market while raising public awareness of real estate security tokens. Future of virtual assetsAhn Hyun-jun, CEO of FOBL, said he plans to make his company an innovator in virtual asset development and create various types of crypto assets that extend beyond real estate-based security tokens.   Furthermore, a FOBL spokesperson stated that this networking party will serve as a forum for Web3 and STO experts to explore new technologies and innovative investment strategies, providing valuable insights for investors and market participants. 

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is set to exclude stablecoins from the list of digital assets corporations will be permitted to trade under forthcoming corporate crypto trading guidelines, according to a report by Herald Business.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashThe guidelines will outline the conditions under which listed companies and registered professional investment firms can buy and sell digital assets for investment or treasury management purposes. As regulators move to prevent speculative or indiscriminate investment in the early stages of opening the market to corporations, they have opted to limit the scope of permitted assets. Consequently, U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins such as USDT and USDC are expected to be excluded from the approved list. Authorities plan to release the trading guidelines after the Digital Asset Basic Act is finalized. This move partly reflects regulatory constraints: stablecoins are not currently classified as cross-border payment instruments under South Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act. The law requires payments and receipts involving such instruments to be processed through authorized foreign exchange banks, leaving stablecoins outside the regulated framework. Companies seek stablecoins for FX hedgingThis exclusion, however, does not entirely prevent companies from trading stablecoins. Firms can still access them through overseas channels, including external wallets like MetaMask or over-the-counter platforms operated by exchanges such as Coinbase. Currently, South Korean companies cannot open corporate crypto accounts domestically, making it difficult to use digital assets for formal trade settlement. Nevertheless, payments in stablecoins are sometimes still handled through individual or offshore accounts. Given these workarounds, some listed companies with large international trade exposure have petitioned regulators to allow stablecoins under the proposed corporate investment guidelines, according to people familiar with the matter. Advocates argue that stablecoins like USDC can be easily traded on exchanges and track the U.S. dollar in real time, making them a highly effective tool for managing foreign-exchange risk. As the industry awaits this regulatory clarity, the impact is already rippling into the traditional financial sector. Kbank—the banking partner of Upbit, Korea’s largest crypto exchange—recently debuted on the KOSPI benchmark index after two previously failed attempts to go public. According to Bridgenews, Korea Investment & Securities initiated coverage on March 6 with a “neutral” rating, noting that regulatory uncertainty and rising lending competition could limit the bank's near-term growth. However, the brokerage added that the lender’s valuation could improve if it successfully expands its crypto business alongside clearer regulations. Baek Doo-san, an analyst at Korea Investment & Securities, noted that Kbank’s valuation could see re-ratings if the Digital Asset Basic Act and policies promoting the stablecoin industry are implemented quickly. He said that despite potential overhang risks, faster policy progress could drive multiple expansion, adding that the bank could then be valued in line with its peers’ price-to-book ratios. Survey shows persistent market fearThese shifting regulatory sands come at a time when the broader crypto market remains under pressure. According to a weekly survey of South Korean investors conducted by CoinNess and Cratos last week, 24% of respondents expect Bitcoin to rise or surge this week, up from 10.3% in the previous survey. Another 28.1% expect the market to move sideways, compared with 25.5% a week earlier, while 47.9% predict a decline or sharp drop, down from 64.2%. Although bullish sentiment has ticked upward from the previous week, bearish expectations still dominate the overall landscape. When asked about broader market sentiment, 43.4% of respondents said they felt fearful or extremely fearful. About 35.4% described sentiment as neutral, and only 21.2% reported feeling optimistic or extremely optimistic. With safe-haven markets facing renewed uncertainty amid geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran, the survey also explored how a potential correction in South Korea’s stock market might affect cryptocurrencies. The largest share of respondents, 39.7%, believed it would be negative for crypto. Meanwhile, 23.6% said it would benefit Bitcoin exclusively, 23.4% felt it would be positive for the broader crypto market, and 13.3% expected it to have no impact.