Hana Financial Group bets on stablecoins and AI as crypto adoption surges in South Korea

South Korean retail investors are pulling back from cryptocurrencies after months of falling prices, rotating capital into domestic equities in a sharp reversal from last year’s trading boom, according to a report by Bloomberg.Photo by Timothy Ries on UnsplashCrypto prices have declined since October, leaving many individual traders nursing heavy losses. In January, trading volumes on local exchanges have dropped roughly 65% year-on-year. By contrast, trading value on the KOSPI, the primary benchmark index of Korea's stock market, has surged 221% over the same period, reflecting a decisive shift in retail risk appetite. Korean investors—who had heavily favored volatile altcoins—are now reallocating funds into domestic and overseas equities, particularly artificial intelligence and robotics stocks. Brokerage margin balances have surpassed 30 trillion won ($20.8 billion), suggesting speculative capital has migrated rather than disappeared. South Korea has long been one of the world’s most retail-driven crypto markets, with individual investors playing an outsized role in price formation and trading volumes. The recent downturn, however, has exposed the risks of a market concentrated in smaller tokens. The rotation back to equities has also coincided with political momentum around boosting the stock market, including President Lee Jae-myung’s pledge to push the KOSPI toward 5,000. Ownership limits spark debateAs retail enthusiasm cools, regulatory questions are moving to the forefront. A debate has emerged over potential limits on major shareholders’ stakes in crypto firms—a proposal that has stirred controversy over governance and competitiveness. According to MoneyToday Broadcasting MTN, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byoung-dug recounted a recent dinner conversation in Seoul in which Eric Trump, the second son of U.S. President Donald Trump, reportedly reacted skeptically to the idea. Trump was said to have questioned whether such ownership restrictions would be conceivable in the United States. Supporters argue that ownership caps could strengthen oversight and reduce excessive concentration of control in crypto firms. Critics warn they could deter investment and weaken Korea’s position in an increasingly competitive global market. Innovation continues despite slowdownEven as crypto volumes shrink, financial innovation tied to digital assets is pressing ahead. Decentralized exchange Lighter said on X that it will support perpetual futures contracts linked to major Korean equities. The products include exposure to Samsung, SK Hynix, and Hyundai, as well as a KOSPI index-based contract with 10x leverage. The move reflects a broader convergence between crypto platforms and traditional financial assets.  Regional competition intensifiesKorea’s regulatory direction is also being watched across Asia. Speaking at the Consensus Hong Kong, lawmaker Johnny Ng said the city could draw lessons from South Korea and the United Arab Emirates in shaping its crypto framework. According to CoinDesk, he noted that the UAE has established a robust regulatory structure with dedicated oversight, while Korea operates a government body tasked with supervising crypto activities. As financial centers compete to attract crypto businesses, clarity in regulation has become a strategic differentiator. For now, Korea’s crypto market appears to be recalibrating rather than collapsing—with retail traders retreating, policymakers debating guardrails, and new leveraged products testing the boundaries of innovation. Whether this marks a transition toward a more mature phase or merely a pause in speculative fervor may depend on how the country balances investor protection with growth. 

Dubai Regulator Issues Reprimand to OPNX FoundersThe Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the regulator that concerns itself with the digital assets market in the Emirate of Dubai, has formally reprimanded the founders of digital asset exchange OPNX.Photo by Kai Pilger on UnsplashVARA issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 to inform investors that OPNX was not a licensed entity regulated by VARA and with that, it urged investors to be cautious. The regulator has now gone one further, this time formally writing to OPNX’s founders to reprimand them.The statement cites the following rationale for the issuance of the reprimand:”Carrying out VA (Virtual Asset) Exchange Services on an unregulated basis in and from the Emirate of Dubai; and Marketing, promoting and/or advertising OPNX services and its native token [FLEX] without the necessary permits from VARA.”Contextual backgroundThe statement goes on to provide the context for the regulator’s most recent action. VARA became aware of OPNX soliciting the public to use the exchange in February of this year. It noted that the business was actively marketing through various social media channels “without establishing warranted restrictions for residents of Dubai/UAE.” VARA went on to explain that OPNX commenced trading in April without having secured a regulatory license despite the activity warranting such a license.Cease and desistOn February 27, VARA issued OPNX with a cease and desist order, relative to the foundation of the business and the marketing and promotion of services. Thereafter, the exchange applied certain restrictions but the regulator deemed the measures to not have been applied comprehensively across all OPNX communication channels, prompting it to issue a further cease and desist order the following month.The investor and marketplace alert followed in April as OPNX proceeded to launch its exchange. The written reprimand was then issued on April 18, “to address historical and ongoing activity conducted on an unregulated basis.” The recipients included the OPNX founders, (Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, Kyle Davies and Su Zhu) and the firm’s CEO Leslie Lamb.Given what the regulator deems to have been “a continued lack of satisfactory remedial action [taken] by the responsible parties,” it is continuing to actively monitor the situation. VARA stated that it will further investigate OPNX’s activity to assess further corrective measures that may be required to protect the market.Lack of industry supportThe digital assets industry is in no way enamored with founders Davies and Zhu. Their record has been badly blemished by the unceremonious collapse of their crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital, in 2022. That failure wreaked major damage on the overarching crypto space, directly leading to the failure of other crypto businesses later that year.Prominent crypto venture capitalist Michael Arrington said of their capital raise for OPNX that it was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.” It later transpired that two of the investment firms that OPNX suggested were backing the start-up refuted the claim.In response to this latest development, OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb told Blockworks that the business was initially launched in Hong Kong. “To confirm, we have no Dubai or UAE customers and do full KYC on all users,” she stated.

Beleaguered Indian crypto exchange WazirX took to social media on April 21 to clarify to the company’s creditors that it is moving closer towards restarting the platform. While the company hasn’t gone into bankruptcy following a $230 million platform hack which occurred in July of last year, it is going through a restructuring process via the Singapore High Court. Posting on the X social media platform, the company addressed concerns surrounding the restarting of operations.  It said that it understood that users were keen to see the platform restart, while reminding stakeholders that from the outset of the process, it had forecasted a first distribution of user funds and a restart of the platform within the April to May 2025 timeframe. Photo by matthew6910 on UnsplashMay court hearingThe firm outlined that its parent company, Zettai PTE Limited, has accomplished all steps to date, in order to bring about the re-emergence of the platform. It has put forward a scheme of arrangement to the court to distribute assets available to it to creditors and bring the trading platform back online.  It identified a May 13 court date as being pivotal to these plans, when the Singapore High Court will hold a sanction hearing and determine whether it confirms the company’s restructuring plan. WazirX added: “While we’ve worked to stay aligned with the previously shared timelines, court proceedings operate independently, and we respect that process. After the Scheme is sanctioned, the First Distribution and restart will follow within 10 business days from the Effective Scheme Date, as outlined earlier.” 85% payoutEarlier this month, 93% of WazirX creditors, accounting for 94.6% of the overall funds owed, voted in favor of the company’s restructuring plan. As part of the plan, users would be compensated with a payout over several distributions of 85% of the overall funds they held on the platform as of July 18, 2024. The company also plans to issue creditors with a recovery token, in an effort to provide them with further value over time. This communication from the company followed the announcement of a court judgement last week by India’s Supreme Court dismissing a lawsuit filed by 54 WazirX users who have lost funds due to the 2024 hack. While the action was dismissed, one of the plaintiffs pointed out on X that the Supreme Court hadn’t indicated that their action lacked merit. He added:”Our criminal writ petition against #WazirX & Nischal Shetty & others was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.” On that basis, it would appear that the company may still have to deal with such a complaint if brought via a different forum. Over the course of the past 12 months, the WazirX hack stands out alongside an almost $1.5 billion hack at Bybit. In both cases, fingers have been pointed at notorious North Korean hacking group, Lazarus. According to a report published by Chainalysis last December, $2.2 billion had been stolen from crypto platforms in 2024.