Hana Financial Group bets on stablecoins and AI as crypto adoption surges in South Korea

Latest Chinese Crypto Crackdown Sees Influencer Accounts Shut DownMicro blogging platform Sina Weibo, one of China’s most popular social media platforms boasting over 258 million daily active users, has taken decisive action to enforce the country’s stringent regulations on cryptocurrency activities.Photo by Henry Chen on Unsplash80 accounts removedIn its latest announcement on Tuesday, the platform revealed the removal of 80 influencer accounts dedicated to promoting cryptocurrency-related content. These accounts collectively held a substantial following, with over 8 million followers combined.The move by Weibo comes as a response to official legislation aimed at cracking down on activities that breach a range of regulations encompassing telecommunications, finance, banking, online marketing, securities, exchanges, and internet safety. The 80 influencer accounts in question had actively violated these regulations by endorsing and promoting cryptocurrencies.Ongoing enforcementThis isn’t the first time Weibo has undertaken such a measure. It has been periodically purging crypto-related accounts since China’s cryptocurrency ban took effect in September 2021. In March of this year, Weibo already took down 131 accounts associated with crypto and stock trading activities.The most significant nationwide crackdown occurred in August 2022 when the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) stepped in, resulting in the removal of a staggering 12,000 influencer accounts across both Weibo and Baidu. Furthermore, 51,000 promotional posts related to cryptocurrencies were deleted. The CAC justified these actions by emphasizing their intent to protect the public’s property safety, educate citizens on responsible investment practices, and discourage participation in speculative cryptocurrency trading activities.Weibo echoed similar sentiments in their previous enforcement actions, vowing to increase the crackdown on illegal securities activities on their platform while strictly adhering to legal regulations.Worldwide issueCrypto promotion and crypto influencers are coming under increased scrutiny worldwide. In a recent filing by the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States in its criminal prosecution against Sam Bankman-Fried, the Founder and former CEO of failed crypto exchange FTX, it asserted that promotion by way of ads featuring US comedian Larry David and American sports star Tom Brady had blurred the lines between FTXs international and US businesses.Class action lawsuits have been instigated against a long list of crypto influencers and promoters relative to FTX, Celsius, BlockFi, and a number of other high-profile failed crypto platforms.Last month, details emerged of a grizzly end for Argentinian crypto influencer Fernando Perez Algaba, whose dismembered body was found in a suitcase in a town close to the Argentinian capital, Buenos Aires.China’s intensified scrutiny over crypto activities in recent years is driven by multiple factors, including concerns about capital flight, money laundering, and the imperative to safeguard state-controlled cryptocurrency initiatives. These measures have not only affected domestic investors but have also had unintended consequences for international cryptocurrency enthusiasts.

Lack of Funds Sees Multichain Cease OperationsThe development team behind Multichain, a cross-chain protocol, has recently announced its decision to cease operations due to a lack of operational funds.This announcement follows a report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, which suggested that insiders may have orchestrated a “rug pull” by withdrawing funds. The Multichain team took to Twitter on Friday to inform their community about the suspension of their business activities, citing a lack of alternative sources of information and operational funds as the primary reasons for their decision.One crucial factor contributing to the shutdown is the absence of communication with the CEO, Zhaojun, who had been missing and is now understood to be in the custody of Chinese authorities. The team explained that they had reached out to Zhaojun’s family and discovered that the police had seized his computers, phones, wallets, and mnemonic phrases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashOperational controlThroughout the project’s lifespan, Zhaojun had maintained control over operational and investor funds. Consequently, the team, along with all their funds and access to servers, found themselves at Zhaojun’s mercy, as he now remains under police custody.Attempting to salvage the situation, Zhaojun’s sister initiated an asset preservation act and transferred some funds to addresses under her control. However, the team soon received news that Zhaojun’s sister, too, had been detained by the police and was now unreachable. Faced with these unfortunate circumstances, the team reluctantly announced the cessation of their operations.DeFi centralization risksThe debacle has raised concerns about the lack of decentralization demonstrated by the level of control Zhaojun had over the project. It prompted comment from Chris Blec, a DeFi Researcher & Analyst who has been highly critical of a whole host of DeFi projects on the basis that while many DeFi projects claim to be decentralized, they’re critically flawed and are centralized to a point that puts them at critical risk.Taking to Twitter, Blec stated: “Dude gets thrown in jail, admin keys to Multichain are on his computers, sister eventually uses his computer to steal money, now she’s in jail too. THIS IS WHY WE DECENTRALIZE.”The Multichain debacle traces back to May when the suspension of Multichain routes for an upgrade caused delays in fund transfers. The uncertainties surrounding the protocol prompted crypto exchange Binance to halt deposit and withdrawal support for certain Multichain bridged tokens.Adding to the platform’s woes, significant outflows from the Multichain MPC bridge platform raised concerns of an exploit. Observers analyzing the blockchain data reached a consensus on July 6 that the protocol had been hacked, as over $100 million worth of assets were withdrawn from the Fantom bridge on the Ethereum side.As Multichain now faces the unfortunate reality of halting its operations, it serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and risks inherent in the blockchain industry. The lack of operational funds, combined with the absence of communication with key figures and critical points of centralized failure have proven insurmountable for this cross-chain protocol.

Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has reinstated access to its mobile app for users in India via Apple’s App Store and Google Play, saying website access has been restored following regulatory steps taken earlier this year. The company said it registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit–India (FIU-IND) in January 2025 and re-enabled trading functions for eligible users on Feb. 25, with full app access announced on Sept. 8.Photo by appshunter.io on UnsplashPenalty and registration paved way for Bybit’s comebackThe return follows an enforcement action at the start of the year. On Jan. 31, FIU-IND imposed a penalty of 92.7 million Indian rupees (approximately $1.05 million) on Bybit for violations under India’s anti-money laundering law and said its website had been blocked under the Information Technology Act until compliance was achieved. The following month Bybit announced it had paid the penalty and completed its FIU registration. Bybit’s latest announcement comes against the backdrop of India’s cautious approach to sector-wide rules. A government document reviewed by Reuters indicates New Delhi is distancing itself from a comprehensive cryptocurrency law, citing the Reserve Bank of India’s view that regulation could confer “legitimacy” and elevate systemic risks, while an outright ban would not stop peer-to-peer or decentralized exchange activity. India does not have a comprehensive crypto law but applies a flat 30% tax on income from transfers of virtual digital assets (VDAs) and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on consideration paid for VDA transfers under section 194S of the Income-tax Act. Platforms bet on India despite tighter oversightIt's worth noting that authorities had moved to bring offshore platforms within local oversight. FIU-IND issued show-cause notices to nine foreign exchanges (Bitfinex, Bittrex, Binance, Bitstamp, Gate.io, Huobi, Kraken, KuCoin and MEXC Global) in December 2023 and sought to block access to non-compliant services. App store removals of several offshore exchange apps occurred in January 2024 following the notices. Binance later registered with FIU-IND as a reporting entity after paying a fine of 188.2 million Indian rupees (about $2.14 million) for earlier violations, imposed in June 2024. KuCoin also registered, with a smaller penalty of $41,000. In March 2025, Coinbase joined the list by gaining clearance from the Indian financial regulator, announcing plans to launch offerings for retail customers in the country later this year, with other products to follow. Their rush to establish a foothold makes sense, as India topped the Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index, underscoring the country’s widespread embrace of digital assets. Bybit’s re-entry follows a major security incident unrelated to India’s rules. In February, the exchange reported a theft of roughly $1.5 billion in Ethereum (ETH), which the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation later attributed to North Korean actors known as “TraderTraitor.” Shortly after the incident, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said the exchange had replenished the gap in the ETH reserves.