Top

Crypto markets reel as tariffs and credit stress collide

Markets·February 24, 2026, 1:45 AM

The cryptocurrency market has come under renewed pressure as escalating global tariff tensions converge with growing stress in the private credit sector, though a South Korean analyst suggests that prospects for a rebound remain intact.

 

According to Etoday, Yang Hyun-kyung, a researcher at iM Securities, noted that risk assets staged a brief rally after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), were unlawful. However, the relief proved short-lived as tariff fears reignited following the announcement of a 10% levy and a subsequent proposal to increase it to 15%.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/f316aef76da6a225ec1e6375f187a4d2.webp
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

Liquidations surge amid private credit jitters

Yang observed that market volatility intensified as concerns in the private credit market resurfaced after Blue Owl Capital halted redemptions for its Blue Owl Capital Corporation II (OBDC II) fund and initiated a $1.4 billion asset sale.

 

Yang highlighted that $420 million in liquidations hit the crypto market as Asian trading opened on Feb. 23. This included $386 million in long positions and $34 million in shorts, signaling a swift deleveraging.

 

These pressures are reflected in current price levels. According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, is trading just below $65,000, down 1.13% over the past 24 hours. The token remains approximately 49% below the all-time high recorded in October.

 

Bitcoin’s decline has widened valuation losses among digital asset treasury (DAT) firms. Yang estimated that Strategy, which holds 717,131 BTC, is sitting on roughly $7.89 billion in unrealized losses.

 

Yang added that a potential shift toward monetary easing ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, combined with reduced regulatory uncertainty from the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, could serve as short-term catalysts for a rebound.

 

Binance focuses on regulatory alignment in Korea

Despite the market slump, crypto firms are deepening their presence in South Korea. In an interview with ZDNet Korea, Binance Head of APAC SB Seker stated that the company’s focus is not on increasing its ownership stake, but on establishing a compliant, trusted, and sustainable operation in the country.

 

Binance currently holds a 67.45% stake in Gopax, operated by Streami, after securing regulatory approval to become its largest shareholder.

 

Addressing the issue regarding GoFi—Gopax’s DeFi product designed to generate returns for users—Seker said any repayments of unpaid customer funds must comply with Korean commercial law and satisfy relevant legal and administrative procedures. He added that discussions with regulators are ongoing and the company cannot unilaterally set a repayment schedule.

 

Seker also noted that Binance plans to work closely with authorities to advance its business in areas such as institutional investment and stablecoins.

 

Regulators reiterate exchange ownership caps

As the digital asset sector evolves, South Korea is moving to tighten oversight. MoneyToday reported that financial authorities have notified the heads of the country’s five largest crypto exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Korbit, Coinone, and Gopax—of their intention to introduce caps on the ownership stakes of controlling shareholders.

 

The notification is widely viewed as a precursor to the government’s release of the Digital Asset Basic Act, often described as the second phase of the country’s crypto regulatory framework. The Financial Services Commission has maintained that a single largest shareholder’s stake in a crypto exchange should be limited to between 15% and 20%.

 

At the meeting, officials outlined key elements of the forthcoming bill and reaffirmed their intention to enshrine the ownership cap in law. Representatives from the five exchanges and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), the industry body to which the platforms belong, reportedly raised concerns about the proposal.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Apr 07, 2023

Korean Financial Regulator to Inspect Non-Fiat Crypto Trading Platform

Korean Financial Regulator to Inspect Non-Fiat Crypto Trading PlatformThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to launch a comprehensive inspection on crypto trading platform Fobl (previously known as Foblgate) from March 11.©Pexels/김 대정Unlike other major Korean crypto exchanges, such as Upbit or Bithumb, which allow trading between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies, Fobl only offers trading between cryptocurrencies.Inspection on non-fiat exchangesThe FIU’s inspection of Fobl is a follow-up to the regulator’s inspection of GDAC, another Korean non-fiat crypto exchange. This suggests that the FIU will focus on inspecting non-fiat exchanges in the first half of this year.Many in the cryptocurrency industry have been paying attention to the FIU’s move after its first inspection of GDAC, as it could signal the direction in which the regulator would take. Earlier this year, the FIU announced that it would conduct inspections not only on non-fiat crypto exchanges but also on wallet solutions, custodians, and staking service providers. It is known that the FIU has been reviewing anti-money laundering (AML) systems and asset management statuses of these crypto enterprises.Fobl’s possible addition of fiat tradingThe Korean crypto industry suspects Fobl might transform itself into a fiat crypto exchange, considering the FIU’s notice that it will prioritize examining non-fiat exchanges that are preparing to support fiat trading.Fobl CEO’s take on the marketPrior to this news, Fobl CEO Ahn Hyun-joon said in a recent interview with Etnews that the platform is in talks with multiple banks to acquire real-name bank accounts and is complying with all the regulations required by the authorities. During the interview, he also raised concerns about the uncertainty that faces non-fiat crypto trading platforms, pointing out that 97% of the crypto trading in Korea is being carried out in crypto exchanges that support trading of Korean won.In Korea, the financial regulator requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs) offering trading in Korean won to hold real-name registered accounts at domestic banks as a measure to prevent money laundering.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 14, 2023

North Korean Hackers Take Off With $100M Atomic Wallet Honeypot

North Korean Hackers Take Off With $100M Atomic Wallet HoneypotHaving reported last week on a $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet users’ funds, an update on the matter reveals that the situation is much worse than originally thought, with losses now exceeding $100 million.Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash5,500 wallets compromisedThe attack has sent shockwaves throughout the crypto community, raising concerns about the security of decentralized wallets. Atomic Wallet, an Estonia-based project known for its non-custodial approach where users take full responsibility for storing their assets securely, has been hit hard by this unforeseen breach.Elliptic, a crypto compliance analysis company, published an update on the situation on Tuesday. According to that blog article, it estimates that approximately 5,500 crypto wallets have been compromised, meaning that losses have risen to more than $100 million, highlighting the severity of the attack.Despite the significant impact on users, Atomic Wallet has yet to provide an explanation regarding the root cause of these substantial losses. Users have taken to social media in frustration, demanding clarification from the company. Surprisingly, the company’s last direct update on Twitter dates back to June 7, leaving users feeling even more anxious.User frustrationOne user, Ezra Carlson, expressed frustration, questioning why Atomic Wallet didn’t warn users when they were aware of the ongoing hack. Carlson tweeted: “@AtomicWallet why won’t AM give me a straight answer about why they didn’t warn me, knowing full well that they were being hacked, that it was not safe to use AM last week before I made a transfer to my wallet that was then hacked.”Another user, “Real Deal Crypto,” criticized Atomic Wallet’s lack of updates, stating: “Your last update was five days ago — SERIOUSLY?!?!”Although Atomic Wallet acknowledged reports of compromised wallets on June 3, downplaying the impact by claiming that less than 1% of users were affected, the staggering sum of losses indicates a significant breach. Its last communication on the matter came on June 11 when, in responding to a user, the firm said that it continued to investigate and to await Twitter updates on the matter.Hack tied to North Korea’s Lazarus GroupElliptic has connected this heist to the notorious Lazarus Group, a cyber-criminal organization with ties to the North Korean regime, responsible for stealing over $2 billion in crypto assets through various thefts. This attribution marks the first time a significant crypto heist has been openly linked to the Lazarus Group since their $100 million exploit of Horizon Bridge in June 2022.In response to the heist, Elliptic has been collaborating with international investigators and exchanges, mobilizing resources to recover the stolen assets. Their efforts have reportedly led to the freezing of over $1 million worth of funds. However, the thief has adapted its behavior in response to the freezing of assets, turning to the Russia-based Garantex exchange to launder the stolen assets, as noted by Elliptic.This recent attack adds to a series of notable breaches in the crypto industry. Jimbos Protocol experienced an exploit resulting in a loss of $7.5 million, and Tornado Cash faced a malicious proposal that seized control of its governance in May. According to a report by Chainalysis, crypto hackers made off with an estimated $3.8 billion in 2022, with North Korea being responsible for a significant portion of the attacks.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 04, 2023

Binance’s Entry Followed by Increased Scrutiny on Foreign Executives in Korean Crypto Firms

Binance’s Entry Followed by Increased Scrutiny on Foreign Executives in Korean Crypto FirmsSince Binance’s acquisition of South Korean crypto exchange GOPAX earlier this year, it appears that South Korean financial authorities have tightened their oversight of virtual asset service providers (VASPs), according to an article by local news outlet News1.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashAuthorities had previously instructed existing VASPs to report any changes in their location or registered executives. However, according to industry sources on Monday, authorities recently issued a notice to VASPs, emphasizing the importance of reporting the appointment of foreign executives as well. This change in authorities’ approach is not unrelated to the recent incidents involving Binance and GOPAX, which have caused ripples in the Korean market.Ongoing leadership changesBinance acquired a majority stake in Streami, the operator of GOPAX, back in February after GOPAX struggled to make principal and interest payments on its own decentralized finance (DeFi) service, GOFi, in the wake of the FTX collapse that happened in November 2022. In doing so, Binance injected capital into GOPAX in order to provide a solution for the issue.This marked Binance’s entry into the Korean market, with the number of monthly active users in the country soaring since then. A survey conducted in June by blockchain-based polling app Cratos also revealed that the Korean public had an overall favorable opinion towards the acquisition.Following the acquisition, Streami underwent multiple leadership transitions with Lee Jun-haeng resigning and Binance’s Asia Pacific Head, Leon Sing Foong, taking over. Shortly after, Foong also stepped down, and the baton was passed to Lee Joong-hoon, GOPAX’s former Vice President. It is also notable that Foong recently left Binance altogether amid regulatory scrutiny.Streami subsequently submitted reports to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission in line with requirements to inform the regulatory body about these changes. However, the FIU has not yet granted its approval, likely due to the legal challenges Binance is currently facing in multiple jurisdictions worldwide.In a seeming effort to address this regulatory roadblock, Streami has recently decided to delegate yet another CEO whose identity has not yet been disclosed. This marks the third leadership shift in just half a year.On the other hand, crypto trading platform Crypto.com also acquired the exchange OKBIT last year. However, its process of entering the Korean market was quite different from that of Binance, as the platform received proper approval for changes in executive positions, such as the appointment of Rafael de Marco e Melo as Chief Financial Officer.Mounting roadblocksIt appears that authorities have now decided to form a more robust oversight system, including monitoring changes in foreign executive appointments at VASPs. However, some argue that such regulatory changes could be perceived as a hindrance for global exchanges looking to enter Korea’s lucrative crypto market where there is a high level of investor sentiment from up to seven million individual investors.To operate as a virtual asset business in the country, businesses must obtain preliminary certification for an Information Security Management System (ISMS) and register as a VASP. Obtaining ISMS certification is a time-consuming process, prompting overseas VASPs to enter the Korean market by acquiring businesses that have already received certification in Korea.However, if the entry barriers to Korea increase as authorities start to scrutinize changes in foreign executive positions, global VASPs may reconsider entering the market.

news
Loading