South Korea regulator targets institutional access to crypto market this year

The Chinese authorities are reportedly mulling over the possibility of approving the use of stablecoins pegged to and backed by the Chinese yuan. That’s according to a report published by Reuters on Aug. 20, with the publication citing “sources familiar with the matter.”Photo by Eric Prouzet on UnsplashInternationalization of the Chinese yuanChina’s State Council, its cabinet and primary administrative authority, has scheduled a review of yuan-backed stablecoins for later this month, a development that could potentially lead to their approval. The Chinese have been leaders in recent years in the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital yuan. The digital yuan was further along in its development than any other CBDC globally, with the Chinese making concerted efforts to bring the digital currency into use at home, with an eye toward global use for international trade. While the U.S. dollar has enjoyed an extended period as the world’s reserve currency, the weaponization of the currency by the U.S., particularly through the application of sanctions, has led BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) nations to consider alternatives. One of Reuters sources asserted that the Chinese authorities are now homing in on the potential to internationalize the yuan via stablecoins. Setting the tone for stablecoin useMembers of the Chinese government leadership are expected to establish the tone for stablecoin use following their upcoming review, outlining the parameters within which the Chinese authorities will permit their use. Reacting to this development, Robin Brooks, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, asserted that China’s newfound interest in yuan-backed stablecoins is a sign of “how insecure China is in the global financial system.” Brooks added that the way to internationalize a sovereign currency is to promote the rule of law and property rights rather than pursue the use of stablecoins, which he described as “ridiculous.”  Growing global interestWhile the Brookings Institution is not directly backed by the U.S. government, the organization is nevertheless a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Despite Brooks’ objection to the use of stablecoins, China is not the only nation to show interest in using them.Taking to X, Raphaël Bloch, co-founder of crypto media platform The Big Whale, pointed out that increasingly, nations around the world are embracing stablecoins due to the efficiency of global currency distribution that is possible via public blockchain networks.  Additionally, stablecoins offer an effective means of government debt financing, given that stablecoin reserves are backed by government bonds. In the U.S., President Donald Trump has ruled out the pursuit of a CBDC. Last month, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Anti-CBDC Act to prohibit the development of a CBDC by the Federal Reserve. Instead, Trump has said that a stablecoin regulatory bill working its way through the legislative system will ensure global dominance for the U.S. in the crypto sector. In June a Deutsche Bank strategist claimed that the legislation would strengthen the U.S. dollar’s global dominance, with several American politicians having since expressed the same view.Earlier this week, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) signaled that it is likely to approve the issuance of a yen-pegged stablecoin. Meanwhile, the authorities in South Korea are working on a bill related to won-pegged stablecoins.

South Korea is weighing a fiat-backed stablecoin, balancing monetary sovereignty against the fact that global stablecoins are dominated by the U.S. dollar while domestic payments are already near-instant.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashThin domestic need despite sovereignty aimsThe case for a won-pegged token is facing challenging headwinds. As a recent Korea Economic Daily report highlighted, skeptics argue the won's limited global demand and lack of reserve currency status would curb its adoption internationally. Domestically, the need is even less apparent. A study by NH Investment & Securities noted that with retail payments settling in seconds via biometrics or passwords, and with world-leading credit card and bank account penetration, the efficiency gains from a stablecoin are marginal at best. Despite this, the appeal of digital currencies is growing. Transactions in dollar-backed stablecoins USDT and USDC on Korea’s five main exchanges totaled nearly $71 billion between January and August, according to CryptoQuant. This rising adoption presents both an opportunity and a threat. While some analysts believe stablecoins could smooth exchange-rate volatility, the Bank of Korea (BOK) has expressed concern. In a recent working paper, Son Min-kyu of the central bank commented that the widespread use of dollar-backed stablecoins could entrench the dollar's dominance, while also amplifying run risk and market volatility in Treasuries during periods of stress. Scarce short-term collateralSeoul also faces a unique structural hurdle: a shortage of short-term government bonds to use as collateral. Unlike the U.S., where stablecoin issuers rely on a deep market for Treasury bills, Korea’s bond market is dominated by long-dated paper. Kim Pil-kyu of the Korea Capital Market Institute (KCMI) described short-term sovereign bills as vital for a stablecoin’s value preservation, a resource Korea currently lacks. As South Korea deliberates, other major economies are forging ahead on divergent paths. Japan is moving to authorize privately issued stablecoins this fall, while the European Union has brought them under its comprehensive Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. UK’s cap plan clashes with pro-innovation pushThis regulatory balancing act is also playing out in the U.K., where a policy rift is emerging. According to the Financial Times, the Bank of England has proposed capping individual holdings of widely used stablecoins at £10,000–£20,000, with a £10 million limit for businesses. Industry groups argue the plan would be expensive to implement and could blunt the U.K.’s competitive edge in digital finance. The central bank's caution also contrasts with the government's pro-innovation stance, with finance minister Rachel Reeves recently pledging to promote the use of stablecoins and tokenized securities. For Seoul, the global shift toward tokenized money is undeniable. With seemingly limited domestic demand and various structural challenges, a won-backed stablecoin is, for now, an idea worth watching as the broader financial landscape evolves. 

Crypto Features in India-UK Markets DialogueAccording to a press release published by HM Treasury, the 2nd India-UK Financial Markets Dialogue meeting held on Wednesday featured six key themes with crypto featuring among them.©Pexels/SkitterphotoThe event brought officials from both nations together in the first in-person financial dialogue since 2017. While the meeting considered banking, insurance and reinsurance, capital markets, asset management and sustainable finance, it also allotted time to discuss payments and crypto-assets.CBDC knowledge sharingBoth sets of officials discussed the scope for augmenting knowledge on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) by way of mutual learning. The officials agreed on the importance of robust global approaches relative to the emergence and development of crypto-assets internationally. The joint statement issued following the meeting revealed that progress relative to the G20 roadmap for enhancing cross-border payments was a matter which was discussed. It’s an item that could have major implications for the use of cryptocurrency in cross border transactions.Global collaborationThe meeting marks another move towards greater global collaboration on policy and regulation relative to digital payment systems and crypto assets. Earlier this month, India’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that the introduction of any new regulations on digital assets needs to be coordinated on a global basis. “The G20 and its members agree that it’s not going to be possible to have an independent, standalone country dealing with crypto assets”, Sitharaman stated at a news conference following a meeting of central bank governors and G20 finance ministers.There’s a growing recognition among politicians, government and central bank officials that decentralized money doesn’t end at a territory’s borders due to its inherently decentralized properties.Taking steps to regulate cryptoWhile on the one hand strategizing as to how digital assets can be best controlled on a global level, India is also taking its own individual steps towards national regulatory action. Recently, it expanded its Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) to include consideration of digital assets. The newly amended PMLA will now deal with the exchange of digital assets for fiat money and vice versa. It also considers safekeeping, transfer and administration relative to cryptocurrency. Furthermore, its broadened scope deals with financial services offered related to virtual or digital assets.Rajagopal Menon, the VP of India’s leading cryptocurrency exchange WazirX, has said that “regulations levied by India have been baby steps toward institutional participation in the crypto exchange.” While market participants in the digital assets space are apprehensive about the regulatory measures that governments and state regulators choose to adopt, so long as the objective isn’t to regulate the innovation out of existence, such developments can have a profoundly positive effect on the digital assets market.There’s no doubt that in line with Menon’s point relative to the Indian context, the same scenario can play out in all digital markets given the application of the right regulatory approach. Institutional investment for the most part has eluded crypto despite many already heralding its arrival in recent years. Institutions move slowly and the only way in which they will be comfortable in working with digital assets is with complete regulatory clarity having been set out.So while some in crypto may be concerned at the mention of global regulatory coordination in respect of digital assets, so long as it doesn’t go too far, greater work towards improved regulatory clarity in the digital assets market can be a catalyst for further adoption and growth in India, the UK and further afield.