Incheon City to Host Blockchain Conference Showcasing its Vision

Regulatory breach sees Philippines initiate blockade on BinanceIt’s been a very challenging year for global crypto platform Binance — one that doesn’t appear to be improving with the latest move to block access to the platform in the Philippines.Photo by Alexes Gerard on UnsplashUnlicensed to tradeIn a noteworthy development, the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declared on Tuesday its intention to block access to the Binance platform due to regulatory irregularities.The SEC asserted in a statement that Binance lacks the necessary license to operate in the Philippines, cautioning the public against engaging in investment products on the platform. The regulator stated:”BINANCE is NOT REGISTERED as a corporation in the Philippines and OPERATES WITHOUT THE NECESSARY LICENSE AND/OR AUTHORITY.”The regulatory body is actively working to have Binance blocked in the country, citing concerns about unregistered investment products. The impending ban is set to take effect within three months, allowing investors a window to exit their positions held through Binance.Pushback on advertisingIn addition to its attempts to block access to the platform, the SEC has also approached tech giants Google and Meta (Facebook’s parent company), requesting the blocking of Binance advertisements on their platforms within the country. This is a response to social media campaigns designed to attract Filipino investors to the embattled cryptocurrency exchange. While users can still download the Binance app from Google and Apple app stores in the Philippines, the extent of investor activity in the country remains uncertain.Follows U.S. regulatory actionThese actions in the Philippines come hot on the heels of Binance’s CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) stepping down and pleading guilty in a U.S. money-laundering case. The Philippines’ ban adds to Binance’s challenges as it aims to expand in Southeast Asia amid legal troubles in the U.S. and restrictions on operations in China.Over the course of a three-month period earlier this year, the world’s largest crypto exchange platform lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands and Cyprus. Additionally, French authorities have been investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.Facing regulatory pushback in the U.S. and Europe, Binance appeared to be concentrating on making further in-roads in Asian markets over the course of this past year. It had recently pursued a joint venture with Gulf Energy in Thailand to launch a new digital assets exchange.Media reports previously suggested that Binance was considering acquiring a Philippine company to obtain operating licenses in the country. The SEC’s move to ban the platform follows a warning issued last year against using Binance, and it represents a broader effort to regulate the cryptocurrency sector and protect the public interest.The recent guilty plea by CZ for violating U.S. money laundering laws has added to the legal woes of the cryptocurrency giant. CZ agreed to personally pay $50 million in penalties as part of a $4.3 billion settlement to resolve investigations into Binance’s practices. He may also still face prison time in the U.S. In the Philippines, the SEC warns that Section 28 of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) allows the application of a fine of up to five million pesos ($90,000) and a maximum prison term of 21 years.

China Furthers Efforts to Shape the MetaverseFindings by US political media outlet POLITICO suggest that Chinese authorities and state-owned companies are seeking to mold the metaverse in line with existing systems in China such as the country’s social credit scoring system.The concept of the metaverse entails a network of interconnected immersive virtual worlds powered by virtual reality, augmented reality, and simulations. Development in this area is centered around applications such as online gaming and virtual events.Photo by Hanson Lu on UnsplashDigital Identity SystemIn a report published on Sunday, POLITICO referenced recently drafted proposals put forward by China Mobile, a state-owned telecoms operator. The proposals outline a “Digital Identity System” for users within online virtual worlds and metaverses.These proposals recommend the use of “natural characteristics” and “social characteristics” within digital IDs, encompassing personal data such as occupation, “identifiable signs,” and other attributes. Moreover, they suggest storing this information “permanently” and sharing it with law enforcement to ensure order and safety within the virtual realm.Setting agreed benchmarks for emerging techThe proposals present a hypothetical scenario involving a disruptive user named Tom, who causes turmoil in the metaverse. The digital identity system, according to these proposals, would facilitate prompt identification and punishment by law enforcement.These discussions are occurring within the framework of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a United Nations (UN) agency responsible for establishing global technology standards. This strategy echoes China’s endeavor to set worldwide benchmarks for emerging technologies.The ITU, as a UN agency, holds significant sway in defining global telecommunications and technology infrastructure standards. Given that the US and China have quite different outlooks when it comes to technology governance, particularly the future development of the internet and related technologies, the ITU has become a means through which common ground can be found and differences resolved.Upcoming vote on proposalsChina Mobile’s proposals, presented during the ITU’s metaverse focus group meeting, are poised to be voted on during the next meeting in October in Geneva. The company is the largest mobile operator by subscriber base. Demonstrative of ongoing tensions that exist between the US and China, the company was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange in 2021 following a US executive order.Chinese organizations are reportedly submitting more proposals than their Western counterparts, demonstrating that China is very much taking a lead in metaverse development. It’s evident that there is a clear strategy for China to establish itself in furthering this technology.In May, Alibaba Cloud, a subsidiary of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group, entered into a partnership with layer one blockchain Avalanche to better enable businesses to deploy metaverses. Around the same time, an administrative body within China’s Henan Province established a $22 million dollar investment fund, focused on financing metaverse-related ventures.Later that month, the city of Zhengzhou announced a set of policy proposals designed to support the growth and development of metaverse companies in the region.Within the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong too, there has been plenty of metaverse-related activity. Metaverse start-up Artifact Labs completed a funding round with a view towards expanding its operations. The city is home to Animoca Brands, a prominent player in metaverse-related development.

Several South Korean crypto-only exchanges have long been struggling to keep their business afloat due to their prolonged weak performances. The local news outlet Etoday reported that the persistent underperformance of these local crypto exchanges is mounting pressure on their corporate operation and management, resulting in them shutting down their businesses. The situation hinders them from meeting the requirements set by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC).  Their inability to generate sufficient revenue, due to faltering token trading volumes, makes complying with the FIU guidelines a daunting task.Photo by Anne Nygård on UnsplashCascading closure of crypto exchanges According to crypto industry insiders, local crypto-only exchanges including Cashierest, Coinbit, Huobi Korea, Probit and Tennten have announced their service closure as early as the second half of last year. On Nov. 6, Cashierest announced it was shutting down its services, with Coinbit following suit in the same month. The cascading closure announcements from crypto exchanges raised concerns about their potential harm on investors.  In an effort to protect crypto investors, the FIU has released a statement that local crypto exchanges are obliged to meet the requirements of the FIU in compliance with the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, despite their closing of services. Furthermore, the regulator said finalizing business closure requires due assessment by the FIU.  "Virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must notify their users of the closure and explain how to reclaim their assets at least one month before the business closing date. They must also support users to withdraw their assets for at least three months before closing," the FIU stated.  Struggling to meet FIU requirements However, some point out that it would be challenging for near-bankrupt crypto exchanges to run a customer service center for more than three months. Some exchanges allow users to deposit and withdraw their assets until their closure, as they would under normal conditions, but charge additional fees afterward. "It is very demanding to operate customer services when we're seeing no actual gains," one exchange official said.  It has been found that some crypto exchanges failed to register a change in their business state with the FIU, which is mandatory in the event of business location or contact changes, under the Financial Transaction Reports Act.  When Etoday reporters visited the offices of some of these crypto exchanges, they were met with empty rooms. One person who is familiar with the matter said, "The exchange has moved its office to another location and is scheduled to resume service in March."