SBI and Saudi Aramco to explore digital asset business partnerships

Intella X Joins Hands with Chainlink Labs to Enhance SecuritySouth Korean gaming company Neowiz announced Wednesday that its blockchain gaming platform, Intella X, has forged a partnership with Chainlink Labs, the founder of the Chainlink blockchain oracle network, to further solidify its position as a secure and transparent blockchain gaming platform.Chainlink’s decentralized oracle network connects data both within and outside of the blockchain — also referred to as on-chain and off-chain — which enables developers to build Web3 applications with access to real-world data and off-chain computation across any blockchain.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashEnhancing security and transparencyThe joint collaboration aims to apply Chainlink Labs’ on-chain and off-chain data connection technology to Intella X. By doing so, they plan to enhance the security of Intella X’s various services, including blockchain games and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).To ensure transparency within its blockchain gaming platform, Intella X will utilize Chainlink Labs’ verifiable random function technology to generate random values during game operations without compromising security or usability, supporting fair gameplay for all users.Scaling the platformAdditionally, they are considering technical collaborations to increase the platform’s scalability by using Chainlink Labs’ Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol, which enables connectivity between different blockchain networks through a single interface.Operating on the Polygon blockchain platform, Intella X offers various in-house platform services, such as its decentralized exchange (DEX) and its NFT launchpad and marketplace. The platform has also soft-launched the Android and web versions of its IntellaX Wallet — a Web3 wallet for Web2 and Web3 gamers — and is ready to expand its ecosystem.

Korean Crypto Exchange Alliance Launches Its Official WebsiteThe Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), which comprises South Korea’s five major cryptocurrency exchanges Gopax, Bithumb, Upbit, Korbit, and Coinone, announced the launch of its official website on Tuesday.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsWebsite structure and featuresThe website has three primary sections: Introduction, News, and Archives. The Introduction section provides comprehensive information about the exchange, including a greeting from Chairman Lee Sirgoo, who also serves as the CEO of Upbit’s operator Dunamu. It also presents an organizational structure, details of the corporate identity, and links to each individual exchange.The News section provides users with announcements, press releases, and event information. Meanwhile, the Archives section houses educational videos, institutional reports, and a list of important statutes and regulations.Mitigating information disparityDAXA Vice Chairman Kim Jae-jin said the website would offer easy access to information concerning digital assets and the alliance’s self-regulatory measures. She mentioned the group’s commitment to investor protection, focusing on addressing information asymmetry.In addition to the website, DAXA runs a Youtube channel, with its first video uploaded in January of this year.Controversy surrounding the allianceEarlier this year, DAXA faced backlash after it implemented a new clause in its guidelines, which disallowed the re-listing of cryptocurrencies that had been removed from its member exchanges for a period of one year. Critics claimed that DAXA’s guideline was unclear and voiced concerns about the Alliance’s growing influence in the crypto sector. These worries are amplified by the fact that the member exchanges of DAXA command 98% of the crypto trading volume in Korea.

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.