Grab joins hands with StraitsX to enable stablecoin retail payments across Asia

Singapore’s Regulator Imposes 9-Year Ban on 3AC FoundersSingapore’s central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), has handed down a nine-year prohibition order to Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, co-founders of the failed crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Swapnil Bapat on UnsplashSevere restrictionsThe penalty relates to alleged violations of the city-state’s securities laws. The prohibition order came into effect on Wednesday, carrying severe restrictions for Davies and Zhu.During this nine-year period, Davies and Zhu are prohibited from engaging in any regulated activities in Singapore. They are also barred from managing, serving as directors, or holding substantial shares in any capital market services business within the territory of Singapore.Loo Siew Yee, the Assistant Managing Director of Policy, Payments, and Financial Crime at MAS, emphasized the seriousness of the violations in a statement released by the central bank on Thursday. Yee stated:“MAS takes a serious view of Mr. Zhu’s and Mr. Davies’ flagrant disregard of MAS’ regulatory requirements and dereliction of their directors’ duties.” She further asserted that MAS would take action against senior managers who engage in such misconduct.Securities law violationsMAS’s decision to impose these sanctions on the 3AC co-founders was based on its findings of further securities law violations during investigations into 3AC and its founders. The regulatory authority accused Davies and Zhu of failing to inform MAS when 3AC hired a new business representative, providing false information to the regulator, and neglecting to establish an appropriate risk management framework.3AC’s troubles stemmed from the crypto market crash that occurred last year, triggered by the Terra ecosystem’s collapse. The hedge fund’s leveraged crypto positions exposed it to billions in loan defaults, resulting in significant financial losses. Its lack of risk management had a cascading effect in crypto. Lenders like Celsius and BlockFi had exposure to 3AC, leading to further collapses later in 2022 as a consequence.3AC’s creditors claim that the firm owes as much as $3.5 billion, and liquidators are now seeking to recover approximately $1.3 billion from Zhu and Davies, who allegedly incurred the debt when the firm was already insolvent.Regulatory reprimandsThis action by MAS follows last June’s reprimand of 3AC, which occurred just before the hedge fund filed for bankruptcy amid widely reported insolvency issues. At that time, MAS had criticized 3AC for providing false information, failing to report directorship changes involving Zhu and Davies, and exceeding the legal assets under management threshold.It’s just the latest reprimand the duo have received from a regulator this year, though. Zhu and Davies have been busy in trying to get another start-up off the ground. Earlier this year, they launched OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform. The venture is based out of Dubai, and the firm reported in April that it had gotten significant VC backing.Many of those that the company claimed were backing the venture disassociated themselves from those claims. The following month, the Dubai regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), reprimanded the OPNX founders, having issued an investor alert relative to the firm a few weeks prior to that. VARA's complaint was that the business had been operating without having acquired the appropriate licensing.

Klaytn Foundation Denies Embezzlement Allegations Involving KLAYThe Klaytn Foundation, the group behind virtual asset KLAY, has denied allegations against the former chairman of Kakao, the South Korean messaging app developer, as well as executives from its subsidiaries, according to local news outlet Digital Asset. These allegations accuse them of embezzlement involving the cryptocurrency.A formal complaint detailing these allegations was submitted on Wednesday by Economic Democracy 21, a civic group, to the joint crypto-crime investigation division of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office.Photo by alleksana on PexelsKlaytn’s responseIn response, the Klaytn Foundation has characterized the allegations as arbitrary and unfounded. The foundation is taking the matter seriously and is planning to conduct a comprehensive fact-check to actively address the claims.Civic group’s claimsEconomic Democracy 21 contends that select insiders at Kakao and its subsidiaries have illicitly accumulated hundreds of billions of Korean won. According to the group, this was done by converting KLAY tokens into cash under the pretense of investment and compensation.Ongoing commitmentIn the midst of this legal dispute, the Klaytn Foundation reaffirmed Klaytn’s steadfast dedication to advancing its scheduled initiatives in collaboration with its ecosystem partners.

On Wednesday, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) in Hong Kong launched investigations at six premises controlled by Worldcoin, the biometric cryptocurrency project established by Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI. Potential personal data privacy risksIn a statement, the Privacy Commissioner expressed serious concerns about potential risks to personal data privacy. The PCPD executed warrants as part of the inquiry into Worldcoin's identity verification project, particularly focusing on the use of iris-scanning orbs for identity verification. The PCPD urged Hong Kong residents to consider the implications of Worldcoin's biometric data collection and emphasized the importance of evaluating the legitimacy of such data collection. The Commission also advised individuals to inquire about the purpose of data collection, the intended use of the data, the classes of entities with access to the data, the retention period of biometric data and the safety measures implemented to protect sensitive information. "The PCPD is concerned that the operation of Worldcoin in Hong Kong involves serious risks to personal data privacy, and believes that the collection and processing of sensitive personal data by the relevant organization may be in contravention of the requirements of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance," stated the privacy watchdog. The Commission highlighted that any personal data controlled by Worldcoin must be collected for a lawful purpose related to the project's function or activity, with the information collected from users' irises deemed sensitive according to regulatory guidelines.Photo by Harpreet Singh on UnsplashGlobal scrutinyWorldcoin, which commenced operations in 2021 and officially launched in July 2023, has faced regulatory scrutiny in various countries due to privacy concerns. As of December 2023, Worldcoin reported that over 5 million people had created accounts using their identities. However, the project's approach to identity verification through iris scanning has triggered investigations and actions by regulators. Notably, the project suspended services in Kenya and halted iris scans in India in response to regulatory challenges.  The company’s activities in the French and Brazilian markets have been suspended. Last year the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office said that it would make further enquiries into the company’s activities. Meanwhile, the German data watchdog has been investigating Worldcoin since 2022. In an effort to clarify the efforts the company is making to achieve compliance across international jurisdictions where data privacy is concerned, Worldcoin recently published a blog post on the subject. Within it, the company states that it “is designed to be fully compliant with all laws and regulations governing data collection and data transfer." Despite its ongoing regulatory challenges, Worldcoin CEO Alex Blania remains steadfast in advancing the project's mission, stating recently:"We race toward billions of users as fast as we possibly can."  The project closed out 2023 by expanding into Singapore. The privacy concerns surrounding Worldcoin underscore the growing importance of balancing technological innovation with robust data privacy regulations to ensure the protection of individuals' sensitive information.