bitFlyer Moves to Comply With Travel Rule

Kazakhstan shuts out 980 non-compliant crypto exchanges in 2023Kazakhstan has implemented stringent measures in 2023 when it comes to regulating the crypto sector, resulting in the closure of 980 crypto exchanges that failed to comply with government regulations.That’s according to a press release published by the Central Asian country’s Financial Monitoring Agency (FMA), the state entity responsible for anti-money laundering (AML) policy. These measures, taken over the course of the year, were highlighted during the 39th Plenary Week of the Eurasian Group (EAG) in the resort city of Sanya, in Hainan province in China.Photo by Kuralbek Djumagaziev on UnsplashCombating money laundering threatsThe seminar served as a platform for participating countries to exchange experiences, with an emphasis on leveraging advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence, to effectively combat emerging threats related to money laundering and terrorist financing. The Kazakhstani delegation played a leading role in discussions on virtual assets.Ruslan Ostroumov, the Head of Kazakhstan’s Financial Monitoring Agency, showcased the country’s legislative regulations and robust measures to combat the illegal turnover of digital assets. Ostroumov reported the blocking of 980 illegal cryptocurrency exchange platforms in the current year. Additionally, nine investigations into illegal exchange operations, amounting to $36.7 million, have been initiated, accompanied by ongoing preventive measures.Registration process complexityWhile the seminar’s organizers commended Kazakhstan for its proactive stance against financial crimes in the virtual assets space, the country’s crypto laws have added complexity to the registration process for exchanges.In November, the Kazakhstani authorities blocked local access to the Coinbase website due to potential violations of the country’s digital asset legislation. This decision aligned with the law on digital assets, effective since February 2023, which prohibits the issuance and trading of digital currencies and cryptocurrency exchange businesses without proper licensing.While challenges remain for crypto platforms within Kazakhstan, some have been successful in their efforts. In May, crypto derivatives trading platform Bybit was successful in gaining approval to offer its services within the country. Binance followed suit in June, securing preliminary approval. Other platforms such as CaspianEx, Biteeu, ATAIX, Upbit, Xignal and MT have been granted permission to conduct trade in Kazakhstan.In December 2020, Kazakhstan formally legalized cryptocurrency mining, and on May 6, 2021, the National Bank of Kazakhstan announced plans to issue a “digital tenge,” their version of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Various CBDC-related projects have followed. In September, the National Payment Corporation, an entity which will be responsible for CBDC development, was launched. The same month, the National Bank of Kazakhstan entered into a collaboration with financial messaging service SWIFT to work on an interoperable CBDC connector.For the most part, these comprehensive regulations and the issuance of a CBDC signify Kazakhstan’s broader acceptance and adaptation to the cryptocurrency landscape. Authorities internationally are trying to find a balance between adequate regulation and enabling innovation to take place. Kazakhstan is no exception, and with that, there are bound to be challenges as regulatory frameworks are optimized and tweaked along the way.

Lee Bok-hyun, the governor of South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), is set to have a meeting with Gary Gensler, the chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in May. The purpose of their meeting is to discuss whether to classify non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as virtual assets. Currently, NFTs are not seen as virtual assets in Korea, but there is a high likelihood of them being acknowledged as such following the meeting in May, local financial media outlet Edaily reported.Photo by Andrey Metelev on UnsplashLack of definition for NFTsAn NFT is a digital certificate of authenticity that is not fungible or replicable. NFTs tokenize content or assets of various types – from images, music, videos, games and artworks to real-estates – by assigning a unique token ID to them. Many see 2018 as the year NFT technology was first introduced.  Despite its wide range of applications, no legal definition has been made for NFTs. Some view NFTs as technology, and others as virtual assets or securities. The Korean government decided not to recognize NFTs as virtual assets under the Virtual Asset Protection Act (Virtual Asset Act), effective in July. Behind this decision is a perception that NFTs are less likely to pose significant risks to the market, as a large portion of NFTs are now traded by collectors seeking to expand their private collections.  However, NFTs are increasingly seen as speculative destinations by many investors over time, as prices of virtual assets including BTC surge. This shift backs the local movement to recognize NFTs as well as spot bitcoin ETFs as virtual assets. Opposition from NFT businessesBlockchain industry insiders say defining NFTs is of utmost importance, noting that classifying NFTs as virtual assets headfirst could deal a heavy blow to businesses in this sector. One finance insider mentioned that defining NFTs comes down to understanding their purposes and how they are utilized. If NFTs are primarily used for speculative purposes or as currency, they could be recognized as virtual assets, the person said.  The biggest resistance is coming from NFT-related businesses. That is because recognizing NFTs as virtual assets would require these businesses to obtain a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license from the financial authority, which takes significant costs and workforce in the process. A CEO of a blockchain startup, who preferred to remain anonymous, expressed concerns about the possibility of NFTs becoming virtual assets, saying that such recognition would enable NFT transaction tracing, potentially leading to severe violations of human rights. While many industry insiders expect that the financial authorities will bring NFTs under the forthcoming Virtual Asset Act, the FSS stated that no decisions have been made regarding details of the upcoming meeting with the U.S. SEC. 

Ripple Exec: Clear Regs Helped Japanese Market Withstand Crypto WinterEmi Yoshikawa, the Vice President of Strategy & Operations at business-focused crypto solutions provider Ripple, has attributed the Japanese cryptocurrency market’s ability to withstand the recent crypto winter to well-defined regulations.©Pexels/WorldspectrumSecurity breach at Mt.GoxIn a recent interview with Korean blockchain media outlet Digital Asset, Yoshikawa noted that Japan implemented regulations on cryptocurrencies earlier than other countries, in part due to the 2014 security breach at the Tokyo-based Bitcoin exchange Mt.Gox that resulted in investor losses.The Mt.Gox exploit prompted revisions to the Payment Services Act, which now recognizes cryptocurrencies as a means of payment. Furthermore, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act was revised in 2020 to give security tokens the same status as stocks. The Japanese government is also exploring the possibility of allowing the domestic circulation of foreign stablecoins.Although it took several years for companies to enter the market after the regulatory framework was established, the security token market has since expanded, with more businesses now participating.Yoshikawa credited the Japanese crypto market’s resilience during the recent global crypto winter to clear regulatory guidelines. The recognition of cryptocurrencies as financial instruments enabled the regulation of not only spot trading but also derivatives trading. Japanese exchanges are also required to hold customer funds separately in trust firms, ensuring investor protection. This regulatory environment allowed companies and investors to confidently enter the crypto industry last year.FTX JapanFTX Japan’s return of customer assets and resumption of withdrawals in February showcased the effectiveness of these clear regulatory guidelines. Among subsidiaries of the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, FTX Japan is the only one to have returned customer assets thus far, Yoshikawa emphasized.While crypto regulations in some areas, such as taxation, remain insufficient, both the Japanese government and entrepreneurs agree that the Web3 industry should develop in a way that benefits the nation’s economy.Ripple’s projects in JapanYoshikawa said that Ripple views the Japanese market as one of its key markets. In 2016, the company formed a joint venture, SBI Ripple Asia, with Japanese financial group SBI Holdings. Through this partnership, Ripple collaborated with several Japanese financial institutions to launch RippleNet and provide liquidity to the payment service.Japan’s largest remittance technology firm, SBI Remit, has adopted RippleNet and Ripple’s own remittance system On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) to facilitate real-time payments between Japan and Southeast Asian nations. Yoshikawa underlined that Ripple is committed to supporting Southeast Asian workers in Japan who need swift and cost-effective international payments.