HKEX to launch digital asset index with real-time pricing within Asian time zone

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal PropertyAccording to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashProperty classificationLocal news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.Contentious approach to cryptoWhile China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.Differing interpretationsThe divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.Global issueIt’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.

GSR Gets on Path Towards Full Regulatory Approval in SingaporeGSR Markets Pte. Ltd., the Singaporean subsidiary of the global crypto trading firm GSR, has reached a significant milestone in its quest to become a fully licensed entity within the city-state. On Monday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) granted GSR in-principle approval for a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license.Photo by Mike Enerio on UnsplashTrading licenses filtering throughThis development mirrors similar approvals granted to other crypto firms in the region, solidifying Singapore’s status as a hub for crypto and Web3 innovations. The approval of GSR’s MPI license follows hot on the heels of Coinbase Singapore’s announcement of securing a full Major Payment Institution license from MAS.Other companies such as Circle, Blockchain.com, and Crypto.com have also obtained MPI licenses this year. These developments underscore the competitive yet regulated landscape of the cryptocurrency market in Singapore.In-principle approvalThe in-principle approval from MAS empowers GSR to provide crypto and fiat-related services to Singaporean residents and entities. This includes the ability to conduct payment services without the limitations of single transaction thresholds (SGD 3 million) and monthly limits (SGD 6 million). GSR’s CEO, Jakob Palmstierna, expressed gratitude for MAS’s constructive oversight, which has played a pivotal role in shaping the evolving digital asset landscape in Singapore. Palmstierna stated:“We are immensely grateful to MAS for their constructive oversight, which helps shape a growing digital asset ecosystem that we feel proud to be a substantial part of.”Meanwhile, GSR’s COO Xin Song, emphasized the importance of this approval, stating that it enables them to “deepen our local client partnerships and continue in our critical role as a liquidity provider within the ecosystem.”GSR’s presence in Singapore aligns with the country’s burgeoning crypto-friendly environment. Recent surveys indicate that 25% of Singaporeans view cryptocurrency as the future of finance, with 32% having some involvement in crypto ownership. Moreover, Singapore boasts over 700 Web3 companies, positioning itself as a pivotal market for the expansion of the crypto and Web3 economy.Company ambitionsGSR, established in 2013 in New Jersey, offers a diverse range of services, including over-the-counter crypto trading, derivatives trading, market making, and venture capital investments. The firm is no stranger to regulatory compliance, holding Money Service Business licenses across several US states.The company was founded by former Goldman Sachs Executives Rich Rosenblum and Cristian Gil. At the height of the last crypto bull run, the crypto market maker had plans “to add 100 hires every six months for the next few years.” No doubt that ambition has been scaled back since then, given the protracted bear market which has followed.Last month, Gil became embroiled in a spat with Andrei Grachev of rival market making firm, Singapore-based DWF Labs.GSR’s recent attainment of in-principle approval for a Major Payment Institution license from MAS reinforces Singapore’s position as a leader in the crypto space. The firm’s interest in pursuing a compliant route forward and its role as a liquidity provider bode well for both GSR and the broader crypto community in the Asia-Pacific region.

Binance APAC Head Resigns Amid Regulatory ChallengesThe uncertainty swirling around Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, continues as Binance Head of Asia Pacific (APAC), Leon Foong, has resigned from his position.The resignation was reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, with the publication citing people familiar with the matter. Foong played a pivotal role in expanding Binance’s reach across markets like South Korea, Thailand, and Japan.Photo by Marten Bjork on UnsplashRecent pattern of executive exitsFoong’s departure is the latest one in a series of high-profile exits in recent months. Chief Strategy Officer Patrick Hillman and General Counsel Hon Ng are among those who have previously left, as regulatory authorities worldwide tighten their grip on Binance.Binance has been navigating a challenging period as regulatory crackdowns sweep across the global crypto space, prompting strategic shifts and senior leadership changes. Foong’s departure may also signify the company’s effort to realign itself in the face of mounting scrutiny.Market share under pressureThe regulatory backlash has not only led to senior leadership changes but has also impacted Binance’s market share. As authorities have clamped down on Binance due to alleged violations, the exchange’s dominance in the crypto trading market has diminished.Losses of key banking partnerships have compelled some customers to migrate to rival platforms. In some cases, Binance has simply been forced to retreat entirely from offering services in certain jurisdictions.Over the course of a period of three months earlier this year, the company lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Cyprus. French authorities are investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.In recent days, the global exchange platform has also come under pressure relative to the service it extends to Russian users. A Wall Street Journal exposé published last week alleged that Binance’s activities in Russia were in breach of sanctions imposed by the United States. Binance responded by removing the option for customers to transact over the platform using two sanctioned banks. It’s now understood that the company is considering going a step further and exiting that market entirely.LawsuitsBinance’s legal woes began with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filing a lawsuit against the exchange, along with its billionaire Founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ). The lawsuit alleged violations of derivatives regulations and criticized the firm’s compliance procedures. Binance reacted by expressing surprise and disappointment over the legal action.The challenges continued with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing a lawsuit against Binance and CZ in June, accusing the exchange of running unregistered exchanges and engaging in various other violations. Binance has consistently contested these allegations from both the CFTC and the SEC.In response to these challenges, CZ took to X (formerly Twitter) in July to reaffirm the exchange’s commitment to growth despite the setbacks.More concern has been created due to the recent filing by the SEC of a motion “under seal” in its case against Binance. That option is usually taken to prevent public knowledge of sensitive information, which possibly could relate to a parallel investigation from the US Justice Department.There’s likely to be no letup in the cloud that hangs over the business until all enforcement actions and lawsuits have run their course.