Korean and U.S. regulators to discuss recognizing NFTs as virtual assets in May

A recent survey by Turkish crypto exchange Paribu reveals that 99% of Turkish investors are now familiar with digital assets, a significant rise from just 16% in 2020. Digital assets have emerged as the third most popular investment choice in Turkey, overtaking traditional options like real estate. Investors are now nearly twice as likely to consider digital assets over stocks or mutual funds, a trend seen across other Asian nations, where younger investors are favoring crypto over more conventional investments. In Indonesia, for example, digital asset investors reached 20 million this year, far surpassing the 12 million who trade on the country’s stock exchange. In the U.S., a recent Bank of America survey reported a similar trend, with younger investors increasingly gravitating toward digital assets.Photo by Burak Karaduman on PexelsHigh returns and future potential drive interest in digital assetsThe survey shows that Turkish investors are primarily attracted to digital assets for their high return potential, while some view them as the future of finance. Other motivations include fast transaction capabilities, as well as benefits like censorship resistance. According to Paribu’s spokesperson, Nergis Nurcan Karababa, crypto assets may experience higher adoption rates than traditional financial products, as more individuals anticipate mainstream usage of digital assets in the near future. Security a top priority for Turkish investorsSecurity remains a paramount concern for Turkish investors, particularly given the history of hacks and fraud targeting local exchanges. Paribu’s survey, which polled over 2,000 residents and 541 active traders, found that most Turkish investors demand a strong security system from their trading platforms. In recent years, Turkish exchanges have been targeted by hackers, with high-profile breaches impacting investor confidence. In June, an attack on BtcTurk, the country’s largest exchange, reportedly led to a $55 million loss from multiple hot wallets. An earlier collapse of the Thodex exchange in 2021 saw the disappearance of investor funds valued by Chainalysis at $2.6 billion, although local prosecutors cited a lower figure. Thodex’s founder was sentenced to over 11,000 years in prison, underscoring the severity of crypto-related financial crimes in Turkey. Rise in preference for local exchangesDespite security incidents, Turkish investors increasingly favor local exchanges, with 78% indicating a preference for Turkey-based platforms in 2024, up from 63% last year. This trend aligns with a global shift towards domestic exchanges as investors seek platforms regulated by local authorities, providing easier avenues for legal recourse. The collapse of international platforms like FTX has accelerated this trend, and countries such as Nigeria, India and Indonesia have issued new licenses exclusively for local exchanges, restricting foreign entities from operating within their borders. Turkey’s leading position in the MENA crypto marketTurkey ranks as the largest digital asset market in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and is 11th globally in terms of adoption, according to Chainalysis. Between June 2023 and June 2024, Turkey received $137 billion in digital assets, placing it seventh worldwide for total transaction volume. This growing market highlights Turkey’s role as a key player in the global crypto landscape, as well as the increasing integration of digital assets into mainstream financial activities among Turkish investors. 

Taiwan Aims to Propose Special Crypto Law by Late NovemberIn a bid to address growing concerns surrounding offshore crypto exchanges and prevent regulatory arbitrage, Taiwan is actively working towards proposing a draft special crypto law for its first reading by the end of November.Yung-Chang Chiang, a member of the Legislative Yuan, the Taiwanese parliament, emphasized the need for a dedicated crypto asset act to effectively regulate crypto businesses in discussion with The Block on Friday. Chiang believes that cryptocurrencies, as an asset class, significantly differ from traditional financial products and require oversight through a separate, specialized legal framework.Photo by Ian Chen on UnsplashPublic hearingThe Taiwanese politician recently organized a public hearing within the parliament to discuss the draft proposal with key stakeholders, including virtual asset service providers, legal experts, and academics. He argued that while Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) had released guidelines for the crypto sector to establish self-supervisory rules through a potential industry association, these measures lack legal enforceability.Chiang pointed out:“In this case, under the authority of this special law, regulatory authorities can impose administrative penalties on operators who violate these self-regulation rules. Without such a special law, the regulators would lack the ability to impose penalties.”Under the proposed special law, all crypto platforms operating in Taiwan would be required to obtain a permit. Failure to do so could result in regulatory orders to cease operations. Presently, Taiwan mandates that virtual asset service providers comply with anti-money laundering (AML) laws, which were introduced by the FSC in July 2021. However, the broader crypto industry in Taiwan remains largely unregulated.It is unlikely that the special law will pass through all three readings during the current legislative session, which is expected to conclude by the end of this year. Chiang noted: “An election is coming up, and the current legislative session focuses more on reviewing the government’s budget.”Chiang also mentioned the possibility of Taiwan’s FSC proposing its version of the special crypto law, but this is not anticipated until at least mid-2024. He explained: “It’s hard to say exactly when the special law will be enacted, but it should likely occur sometime after the middle of 2024.”Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, is understood to be in the process of registering in Taiwan for AML compliance, despite not currently being regulated in the country. The exchange has formed a local entity named “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” as indicated in the Taiwanese Ministry of Economic Affairs’ database.Banking difficultiesDuring the public hearing, Damien Ho, Representative of Global Partnerships at Binance, raised concerns about the challenges faced by crypto platforms in Taiwan in securing suitable banking services. Despite the FSC’s efforts to discourage banks from treating crypto platforms as high-risk entities, crypto platforms still encounter difficulties in their interactions with banks. Ho suggested that the Taiwanese government should encourage private or public banks to become more crypto-friendly, facilitating the regulated and effective development of crypto businesses.At the public hearing, Winston Hsiao, Co-Founder and Group CRO of Taipei-based crypto exchange XREX, suggested a step-by-step approach to regulation, with smaller entities adhering to self-supervisory rules formulated by the industry association after registration. For larger entities, he proposed obtaining a permit under the special law and potentially applying for other relevant financial licenses.

In a move to enhance the oversight of cross-border wire transfers involving virtual assets, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the central bank of the Philippines, is fortifying the implementation of regulations relative to crypto transfers.Photo by C Bueza on UnsplashTravel rule clarificationsLocal news outlet, the English language newspaper The Philippine Star reported that central bank memorandum 2023-042 provides clarifications on the travel rule for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). The travel rule requires financial institutions to pass on information to the next institution where a transaction takes place. The BSP aims to bring greater clarity to several aspects, including the applicability of the P50,000 transaction threshold and expectations regarding transactions involving jurisdictions without travel rules. Additionally, further interpretation is being provided concerning the extension of the Philippine travel rule to non-custodial VASPs and regulatory expectations surrounding transactions with unhosted wallets or crypto wallets controlled directly by their owners, rather than managed by third-party service providers. FATF compliance ambitionThis regulatory move is in response to the directives from the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In 2021 the Philippines came under greater scrutiny from the intergovernmental organization, when it was included on its "gray list," making it a candidate for increased monitoring. The FATF has called upon the Philippines to establish guidelines for the travel rule to prevent terrorists and criminals from exploiting virtual asset transfers for the unrestricted movement of their assets and to detect and prevent misuse effectively.BSP-supervised financial institutions (BSFIs) are now mandated to scrutinize specific details of virtual asset transfers, including the originator's name, account number used in the transaction, originator's physical address or national identity and the beneficiary's name and account number. International moves towards complianceThis latest move by the Philippine central bank is not unusual. In recent months, a plethora of similarly motivated central banks around the world have tightened up on crypto regulation as it relates to the FATF directives. Being on the FATF's "gray list" is bad for a country’s reputation. It has the potential to result in loss of investor confidence and lead to higher compliance costs and greater monitoring. Additionally, it may have an impact on trade relations and damage a country’s ability to access international finance.  Turkey has also found itself on the organization’s gray list. Working towards repairing that situation, Turkey is in the process of establishing a crypto regulatory framework that will be FATF compliant.In May, Pakistan went a step further in banning cryptocurrency. At the time, its Minister of State for Finance and Revenue, Aisha Ghaus Pasha, stated that the ban had been a requirement for Pakistan’s removal from the FATF gray list. A tightening of crypto regulations has also occurred in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and in Hong Kong more recently, as those territories work towards ensuring FATF compliance. The BSP emphasizes that transactions not surpassing the P50,000 threshold or its equivalent in foreign currency must include the names and account numbers of both the originator and beneficiary. Both originating and beneficiary VASPs are required to establish and adhere to robust sanction screening procedures, ensuring compliance with sanctions lists and preventing transactions involving sanctioned individuals, entities, or jurisdictions.