Remixpoint raises $215M to buy Bitcoin, CEO to receive salary in BTC

Binance withdraws Abu Dhabi bid amid global licensing reevaluationLeading global crypto exchange Binance has chosen to withdraw its bid for a trading license in Abu Dhabi, according to information gleaned from the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) register and a report published by Reuters on Thursday.Photo by Demid Druz on UnsplashChange of directionThe local subsidiary company responsible for the application, BV Investment Management Limited, initially submitted its licensing bid on Nov. 15, 2022. Much has changed in the crypto space and in the fortunes of Binance over the course of the past year, leading the firm to withdraw its application on Nov. 7.This proposed license would have granted Binance the authority to pool and invest funds from professional investors. The decision to retract the bid is part of Binance’s broader reevaluation of its overall strategy going forward. “When assessing our global licensing needs, we decided this application was not necessary,” a spokesperson from the company told Reuters.Adapting to new circumstancesMuch has changed for Binance in 2023. The company has been combating regulatory pushback in multiple jurisdictions worldwide, not least in the United States, where Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) recently reached a plea agreement with U.S. prosecutors and agreed to pay $4.3 billion for violations related to money laundering and sanctions laws.As part of that process, CZ stepped down as CEO, passing the leadership to Singaporean Richard Teng. Teng is a former regulatory executive who previously oversaw the exchange’s regional operations. A spokesperson for the company maintained that this recent decision relative to licensing in Abu Dhabi is entirely unrelated to the recently agreed-upon settlement in the United States.UAE tiesWhile Binance may be dropping its attempts to gain licensing in Abu Dhabi, in July the company acquired a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority in the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) other major center, Dubai. The UAE is also the location where CZ has established his home.Some had speculated that the company had also established its headquarters within the UAE. However, CZ has always refused to disclose the firm’s global headquarters, instead suggesting that the firm has no global headquarters. Teng has taken a similar approach.Binance was originally founded in China in 2017. It then shifted its headquarters to Japan and later established a base in Malta to circumvent regulatory challenges in China. Similarly, it’s thought that regulatory scrutiny provides the rationale for the company’s ongoing stance in refusing to confirm the location of its corporate headquarters.Despite regulatory challenges, Binance had previously expressed a focus on expanding its operations in the Middle East, known for its crypto-friendly environment and specific regulatory frameworks. Binance holds various crypto licenses from regulators in the region. In May of last year, it acquired a Category 4 crypto-asset service provider (CASP) license from the Central Bank of Bahrain.The exchange maintains registrations and licenses across Europe, Asia and other regions. It’s had mixed fortunes in its endeavors over recent months, driven out of some markets while making in-roads in others. Earlier this week, its Binance Japan subsidiary became fully operational. Last week, regulators in the Philippines moved against the company due to regulatory irregularities.

Bank of Korea Conducts Successful CBDC Pilot Test with Financial InstitutionsThe Bank of Korea (BOK) announced yesterday in a press release that its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot program operated successfully in a practical setting involving multiple financial institutions.Testing environmentsPreviously, the CBDC system was tested in an isolated cloud environment. In this recent test, the system was installed on the servers of various financial institutions over a five-month period to evaluate its performance.The 1.2 billion KRW ($905,000) project included the participation of six companies, such as Kakao’s Krust Universe, KakaoBank, and KakaoPay, as well as 14 banks and the Korea Financial Telecommunications and Clearings Institute. Kookmin, Shinhan, and Woori were among the participating banks.Four scenariosThe BOK and financial institutions tested the system’s performance under four scenarios: increasing transaction requests per second, increasing the number of active users, reducing the transaction queue size, and adjusting the block generation time ratio.The increase in transaction requests led to a 10% decrease in transactions per second (TPS), from 2,100 TPS to 1,900 TPS, compared to the single cloud environment test. This result is still deemed acceptable, as the highest TPS recorded in the current small payment infrastructure network is 1,200, which occurs on paydays and other high-transaction days.Issues such as slower response times arose with higher transaction request volumes but were resolved by enlarging the transaction queue size and increasing the block formation time proportion in the block generation process. The block generation process involves two stages: block formation, where transactions are recorded, and block validation, where transactions are verified.Greater stabilityThe test demonstrated that transaction errors at individual institutions did not affect others, suggesting that a distributed ledger system offers greater management stability than a centralized system. However, institutional officers cited challenges in problem-solving and communication when using the distributed ledger system.The BOK plans to involve more institutions in ongoing experiments this year, supporting them in testing their smart contracts on the CBDC pilot system.Photo by Bundo Kim on Unsplash

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.