Japan plans separate tax treatment for crypto ETFs and derivatives

China’s Legal Daily, a publication that falls under the supervision of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Commission for Political and Legal Affairs, has sounded an alarm regarding cryptocurrencies, raising concerns about their use as potential avenues for corruption. In the newspaper’s New Year’s Day edition, it quoted legal scholars, who had convened at the annual China Integrity and Legal Research Association meeting, who underscored the urgency of addressing the emerging threat posed by digital assets.Photo by Max van den Oetelaar on Unsplash‘Hidden channels’ for briberyIn particular, it focused on views expressed by Associate Professor Zhao Xuejun from Hebei University Law School. Zhao Xuejun warned against the use of virtual currency and electronic gift cards as “hidden channels” for bribery. Notably, these forms of payment, often stored in “cold storage” devices, offer a convenient means for transporting funds abroad, the academic claimed. This development aligns with recent warnings from state agencies, including the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, cautioning against the use of stablecoin Tether in yuan-related foreign exchange transactions, deeming such actions illegal. Anonymity and traceability concernsProfessor Mo Hongxian from Wuhan University Law School explicitly mentioned Bitcoin, highlighting the challenges associated with virtual currencies, such as their anonymity and difficulty in traceability, which can facilitate illegal activities. Despite lacking official recognition in China, Professor Hongxian stressed the need for judicial attention to transactions involving virtual currencies. Although China maintains a cryptocurrency ban, it actively explores blockchain technology for identity verification. The country’s central bank digital currency, e-CNY, still in the pilot stage, has witnessed significant development. Despite its limited geographic distribution, the digital yuan recorded transactions totaling nearly $250 billion in China as of June 2023, with international use noted in commodities sales. Varying degrees of enforcementChina has demonstrated that it can at times take a very hard line on restricting cryptocurrency trading and related activities, while at others, it seems to tolerate such activity or turn a blind eye. Last month China’s Supreme Procuratorate provided details on the nature of the prosecution of over-the-counter (OTC) crypto trader and RenrenBit founder, Zhao Dong. Zhao was handed down a seven year sentence for carrying out illicit crypto business operations. By contrast, an investigation carried out by the Wall Street Journal last year found that business has been thriving for the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Binance in China, despite the ban. Other crypto-related activity has been uncovered, flouting capital controls. BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes suggested recently that all wealthy Chinese individuals have access to banking in Hong Kong, allowing them to access, trade and use cryptocurrency. As part of the CCP’s intensified anti-corruption efforts, the focus on cryptocurrency’s potential role in financial crimes underscores the evolving landscape as use of digital currency unfolds. The Legal Daily article emphasizes the need for vigilance and regulatory measures to counteract the perceived threat of corruption facilitated by cryptocurrencies and electronic payment methods.  

Huobi Anticipates Break-Even in Q3 Following Consecutive LossesCryptocurrency exchange Huobi, under the guidance of its advisor and Tron Founder Justin Sun, has reported losses over consecutive recent quarters and is now eyeing a break-even point in the current quarter.Photo by Brands&People on UnsplashThree quarters of lossesIn a tweet posted by Sun on Tuesday, the Tron Founder revealed that Huobi hadn’t registered a profit from the third quarter of 2022 through the second quarter of this year. While exact loss figures were not disclosed, Sun attributed these financial challenges to excessive spending on marketing, advertising, and employee salaries. Notably, Huobi has since reined in these expenses, positioning itself for a potential return to profitability by the fourth quarter.Looking at the overall financial performance of Sun’s crypto entities, Huobi and Tron, the group appears to be on an upward trajectory. Sun’s tweet indicated a combined profit of $85 million, derived from $193 million in revenues and $108 million in expenses.Notably, the Q2 profit saw a substantial increase of 183% compared to the $30 million profit in Q1. Sun’s projections suggest that Q3 could see revenue reach $200 million, expenses remain at $100 million, resulting in a projected profit of $100 million for the quarter.Improved financial outlookSun highlighted on Twitter Huobi’s improved financial outlook, projecting a break-even status for Q3 and a modest profit for Q4 based on conservative estimates. Earlier in the year, Huobi implemented a 20% reduction in its workforce as a response to the cryptocurrency market’s bearish trends.Established in 2013, Huobi had maintained consistent profitability until the last few quarters, according to Sun. He clarified that despite reports linking him as the core investor through the M&A fund that acquired a stake in Huobi, he is merely an advisor to the exchange.Exchange business challengesHuobi’s struggles and subsequent efforts to regain financial stability mirror the broader landscape of cryptocurrency exchanges navigating a volatile market. No major exchange has been unaffected by a challenging business and regulatory environment over the past year.US exchange Coinbase is in a legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that the US Department of Justice is planning on bringing fraud charges against Binance, who is already fighting an action taken by the SEC. Binance has also been forced out of key four important European markets over the course of the past three months.Meanwhile, it has been claimed that KuCoin has been executing a layoff plan, something the company itself denies. In March, the company faced an action brought by the New York Attorney General on the basis of a failure to register as a securities and commodities broker-dealer.Huobi’s difficulties serve as a testament to the challenges and opportunities presented to all of the major international cryptocurrency exchange businesses.The company’s recent financial trajectory, marked by consecutive losses, has caught the attention of the industry. Justin Sun remains one of crypto’s most controversial figures, but with his guidance, the exchange will be working towards rebounding and returning to profitability in the coming quarters.

CoinFLEX’s Creditors Sue CEO and OPNX in Legal DisputeCreditors of Seychelles-incorporated crypto platform CoinFLEX have taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, alleging that his involvement in launching the claims trading platform OPNX violated his fiduciary duties to CoinFLEX.Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashDissatisfied CoinFLEX creditorsAccording to the civil action, which was filed in a Hong Kong court earlier this month, they view OPNX as a competing business to CoinFLEX. The lawsuit also implicates CoinFLEX investor Roger Ver.Lamb joined forces with Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), to introduce a platform for trading bankruptcy claims, initially named GTX (later rebranded as OPNX). CoinFLEX co-founder Sudhu Arumugam also backed the project, with Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, installed as CEO.Lamb and CoinFLEX defended the project, claiming it would enhance transparency in financial markets and benefit CoinFLEX creditors. However, creditors argue that Lamb’s actions indicate a strategic move to distance himself and his associates from CoinFLEX. With that, they’re seeking to prevent him from representing CoinFLEX in the future.Complaint detailsThe creditors of CoinFLEX assert that OPNX was not authorized by CoinFLEX’s board or creditors and that Mark Lamb independently appropriated CoinFLEX’s intellectual property, technology, customer base, and employees to create the claims exchange.They accuse Lamb of entering into a harmful licensing and purchase agreement with OPNX’s parent companies, Open Technologies Holding LTD and Open Technology Markets LTD. Through their lawsuit, the creditors are aiming to nullify these agreements and place OPNX’s assets and profits into a trust.OPNX’s strugglesOPNX has faced difficulties from the point at which it was launched. While Zhu and Davies were once leading figures in the digital assets space, their reputations have been severely tarnished due to the manner of the 3AC collapse and its profound impact on the broader crypto market.In April the platform confirmed backing from various venture capital (VC) entities only for many of the VCs to turn around and deny any such involvement with the project. Having issued an investor and marketplace alert in relation to the firm in April, a short time later the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai issued a formal reprimand to the business' founders.VARA followed up in August, applying a $2.7 million fine. OPNX had entered a bid for troubled Singaporean crypto lender Hodlnaut as part of that business restructuring process. The offer was turned down on the basis that the deal involved OPNX’s native OX token, which was deemed to be far too illiquid. A short time later, the OX unit price plummeted.Zhu was arrested in Singapore last month in connection with non-compliance related to 3AC’s bankruptcy, while Davies’ whereabouts remain undisclosed.CoinFLEX’s creditors also accuse Lamb of reaching a settlement agreement with Roger Ver, known as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver was one of CoinFLEX’s initial investors but later became entangled in a dispute over an $84 million debt he allegedly incurred on the platform due to market volatility. The lawsuit seeks to recover any benefits Ver received from the settlement.On X, a user called @CoinFLEXReal suggested that it has uncovered evidence that Lamb, Zhu, and Davies “used creditor assets as their personal piggy bank.”