HashKey OTC scores in-principle approval in Singapore

Hong Kong–listed companies are stepping up digital-asset bets as the city sets out a clearer rulebook, a sign that tighter oversight and new market rails are starting to unlock institutional demand.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashCorporate moves signal rising appetiteBoyaa Interactive International has been adding Bitcoin (BTC) to its treasury, with the latest acquisition of 411 BTC bringing its total holdings to 4,091 BTC. The gaming company has said it will direct 90% of a planned $56.3 million rights issue into Bitcoin. Yunfeng Financial raised HKD 1.17 billion, or about $150 million, through a new share issuance and plans to use part of the proceeds to launch cryptocurrency trading and investment management services. The firm is associated with Yunfeng Capital, which was co-founded by Alibaba founder Jack Ma, and has previously outlined plans to accumulate BTC, Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL). These moves land alongside a policy reset from the top. In his annual address on Sept. 17, Chief Executive John Lee reaffirmed Hong Kong’s goal of cementing its position as an international hub in finance, including digital assets, while pairing that ambition with stronger investor safeguards. Tokenization and blockchain testbedThe centerpiece is Project Ensemble, run by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). The initiative is building infrastructure for a tokenized market and operates a sandbox where institutions can test blockchain systems in live business settings. Priorities include tokenized bank deposits, settlement of tokenized assets such as money market funds, and standardized issuance of government tokenized bonds. Regulation is advancing in parallel. The government is preparing legislation for a licensing regime that covers stablecoin issuers as well as digital-asset dealing and custody providers. The Securities and Futures Commission is studying an expansion of products for professional investors, with tougher protections baked in. The regulator plans to use automated reporting and data surveillance to curb misconduct. Authorities also intend to deepen cross-border cooperation to combat tax evasion. Banking rules are set to shift as well. The HKMA has circulated draft guidance that would ease capital requirements for certain crypto exposures in line with Basel standards through a new policy module called CRP-1. Under the proposal, assets issued on permissionless blockchains could qualify for lower capital charges when issuers demonstrate effective risk management. Hong Kong aims to implement the international rules by early 2026.Publicly traded BTC treasury firms in China Source: BitcoinTreasuries.NETAdoption amid constraintsNot every institution will join the build-out. Mainland policies may constrain participation, according to Caixin. Chinese digital platforms, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and financial entities operating in Hong Kong could face limits on stablecoin and other crypto activity. Branches of several SOEs and Chinese banks are also unlikely to seek a Hong Kong stablecoin license. Corporate adoption remains broad despite those headwinds. Publicly traded Bitcoin treasury companies in China and Hong Kong hold a combined 19,280 BTC, according to BitcoinTreasuries.net. Several appear among the top 50 public corporate holders worldwide, including Next Technology Holding (16th), Cango (18th), Boyaa (24th), Nano Labs (48th), and Ming Shing Group (50th). The tally points to rising regional interest in digital assets. Publicly traded BTC treasury firms in Hong Kong Source: BitcoinTreasuries.NET

Bankruptcy Judge Permits Terraform Labs to Subpoena FTXIn a significant development in the bankruptcy case of defunct crypto exchange FTX, a judge has granted Singapore-based Terraform Labs the authority to subpoena information related to its ongoing case brought by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashHack allegationsTerraform Labs, the blockchain company that developed the Terra blockchain and failed US dollar stablecoin UST, claims that the failures of its algorithmic stablecoin and governance token were the result of an attack from short-sellers, possibly involving Alameda Research (FTX’s sister company).The order, issued by Judge John Dorsey on Monday, allows Terraform Labs to serve subpoenas to FTX Trading and FTX US, aimed at collecting evidence to support its defense against the SEC’s allegations of fraud. According to court filings, lawyers representing the FTX Debtor have not formally objected to the court order.Terraform Labs’ request for subpoena power stems from its belief that short-sellers connected to FTX entities played a role in the failure of the algorithmic stablecoin and governance token, leading to the collapse of the crypto firm. The ability to obtain information from FTX through the subpoenas could be crucial in bolstering Terraform Labs’ defense against the SEC’s fraud charges.UST collapse falloutThe collapse of the UST stablecoin in 2022 contributed to a major market crash, resulting in a significant drop in the prices of many tokens. As a result, the company filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. The Co-Founder of Terra, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month sentence in a Montenegrin prison for using false travel documents. He may also face extradition to the United States or South Korea on fraud charges related to Terraform Labs.Motion to dismiss deniedIn a separate high-stakes ruling, US District Judge Jed Rakoff denied Terraform Labs’ motion to dismiss the securities fraud lawsuit filed by the SEC. The judge’s decision allows the SEC’s case against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon to proceed, rejecting defense arguments that the agency lacked jurisdiction and that Terraform’s TerraUSD stablecoin did not qualify as an unregistered security.Judge Rakoff’s ruling is a significant victory for the SEC as it intensifies its enforcement actions against crypto companies involved in allegedly unlawful token sales. He found the collapse of TerraUSD, which lost its dollar peg and incurred a $40 billion loss last year, plausible as a reason to consider the token as a security that should have been registered.Moreover, Rakoff dismissed Terraform’s claim that the SEC lacked the authority to regulate stablecoins without explicit Congressional authorization, asserting that the crypto industry was significant enough to warrant application of the “Major Questions Doctrine.” This doctrine limits agency overreach into major political issues but does not apply to the crypto asset markets.The judge also rebuffed Terraform Labs’ attempts to draw parallels between the Ripple case and its own. In the Ripple case, a different judge ruled that Ripple’s XRP token sales to retail investors did not violate securities laws due to the manner of purchase on secondary markets. Rakoff firmly stated that such distinctions did not apply under the legal Howey test governing whether crypto assets qualify as securities.

A crypto wallet reportedly tied to the multinational banking giant DBS Bank holds over 170,000 Ether, valued at nearly $650 million. Reporting on the matter subsequently prompted DBS to make a denial of any links to the wallet.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashClaim asserted, claim deniedOn May 30, blockchain analysis firm Nansen caused some excitement when it took to X, flagging a particular wallet address, identifying it as belonging to an Ethereum whale, taking matters a step further in asserting that the wallet belonged to Singaporean bank, DBS Bank. The submission of securities reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently by many large corporates led to disclosures from some within traditional finance in the United States of Bitcoin holdings via the spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) products which had been approved earlier this year. A substantial holding of ETH by Singapore’s biggest bank would have been a significant boost for proponents of Ethereum. However, DBS Bank promptly refuted these claims. A spokesperson for the bank subsequently issued a statement to Cointelegraph and Decrypt, stating: "In relation to the post, DBS does not have this position on our books."  Claim not retractedFor its part, Nansen has not retracted its claim. In response to Decrypt, Nansen analyst Edward Wilson stated:"We have it under good authority, via several independent sources, that DBS owns the private key of this wallet and these assets are most likely a part of their custody solution." Wilson told Cointelegraph that it had obtained this information from “a good source,” going on to state: “This is similar to how we see institutions, both crypto-native like exchanges such as Binance or Coinbase custody funds on behalf of their users and non-crypto-native custody funds. The institution is the custodian and is responsible for managing the security of the funds.” The Nansen analyst expressed even more confidence in the claim in response to CryptoSlate. Wilson stated:“Nansen is 100% sure this belongs to DBS – DBS owns the private key of this wallet and these assets are most likely a part of their custody solution.” DBS’s foray into crypto servicesIn 2020, DBS Bank unveiled a crypto trading and custody service, including a platform for conducting security token offerings. At that time, DBS Exchange clarified that while the exchange itself would not hold any assets, it would provide custody services to investors. Since launching its crypto division, DBS Bank has seen significant success. In 2023, DBS reported an 80% growth in Bitcoin trading volume, attributing this surge to the crypto market turmoil of 2022. In February of this year, the Singaporean bank moved to integrate its digital asset exchange business into a new global financial markets unit. In April 2023, DBS opened a branch of the bank on the metaverse. It demonstrated its Web3 credentials further in August 2023 by introducing a metaverse game to tackle the issue of global food waste.