Hong Kong's Mox Bank launches crypto ETF trading

South Korea is moving closer to the global stablecoin trend as public curiosity and real-world trials accelerate, even as the country’s central bank signals it wants tight guardrails. A recent analysis from Shinhan Card, reported by Money Today, finds that internet searches for “stablecoin” in South Korea jumped 403% in the first half of this year compared with the previous six months, based on data from major portals such as Google and Naver. Mentions on social media rose 359% over the same period. The spike reflects growing expectations that U.S. dollar-pegged tokens could make cross-border payments faster and cheaper by enabling near-instant settlement at prevailing foreign-exchange rates. Interest has been reinforced by user reviews of actual payment experiences, which climbed between May and July. Crypto-linked cards, including RedotPay and Bybit’s offerings, are already usable domestically and allow top-ups with leading stablecoins such as USDT and USDC. One user described buying a cup of coffee at a local shop with a RedotPay card via Apple Pay. The small purchase underscores how crypto rails are edging into routine spending.Photo by Oat Appleseed on UnsplashFrom curiosity to checkoutTrading venues remain the main arena. According to CryptoQuant, transactions in USDT and USDC on the country’s five leading exchanges totaled nearly $71 billion from January through August, underscoring stablecoins’ central role in crypto liquidity and price discovery. Stablecoin interest in Korea shows a skew toward younger users and men, with men making up 74% of related searches and women 26%. By age, people in their 20s–40s accounted for 66% of searches, while those aged 50 and above represented 34%. Public debate is widening alongside adoption, with some online commenters predicting that stablecoins could chip away at the influence of traditional card networks. At the same time, banks, card companies, and exchanges are bracing for the arrival of a won-pegged counterpart, as the government and parliament prepare a regulatory framework and aim to introduce a bill as early as this month. Domestic card issuers, drawing on their merchant networks and settlement systems, are already exploring how to integrate won-backed tokens in ways that maximize convenience and scalability. Adoption meets skepticismSkeptics counter that Korea’s existing payments infrastructure is already world-class, leaving only marginal gains for a won stablecoin. They also argue that cross-border benefits would be modest because the won lacks reserve-currency status and broad global demand. The Bank of Korea (BOK) has struck a notably conservative tone. Governor Rhee Chang-yong has previously questioned the benefits of a won-denominated stablecoin and warned of risks to the monetary system. Earlier this month, in documents submitted to a lawmaker and reported by The Herald Business, the BOK advised that parliament consider granting it authority to require issuers to deposit reserves at the central bank when necessary. According to the bank, such a measure would strengthen user protection during heavy redemptions, curb money-supply growth outside its control, and ensure that any seigniorage benefits flow to the public. That approach could reduce issuer profits, since deposits at the BOK would not earn interest, just as is the case for commercial banks. The documents also recommend sizing reserves to match the total stablecoin supply, while clarifying that not all of it would necessarily need to be held at the central bank. Issuance path and next stepsAs for who should issue a won-pegged token, the BOK favors starting with a consortium of banks, citing their track record on compliance and the need for a controlled pilot that lets regulators assess and mitigate risks before widening access. The developments suggest a country exploring how stablecoins might integrate into an already sophisticated payments network. Consumers are showing interest, exchanges are handling large flows, and regulators are shaping the legal framework that will define the place of any future won-based digital currency. 

Taiwanese cryptocurrency exchange under investigation for money launderingBitgin, a cryptocurrency exchange in Taiwan, is currently under police investigation for alleged money laundering, with its Chief Operating Officer, Yuting Zhang, arrested in connection to the infamous “88 Guild Hall” money laundering incident. The exchange is cooperating fully with the investigation and has assured users that its operations remain unaffected.Photo by Adam Jang on Unsplash‘88 Guild Hall’ scandalThe “88 Guild Hall” scandal, which unfolded from late 2021 to March 2022, implicated Zhang in a massive money laundering network. The controversy exposed a multi-billion dollar operation orchestrated by local businessmen Zhemin Guo and Chengwen Tu, utilizing a network of foreign exchange offices and crypto exchanges.Yuling Tsai, General Counsel of the Taiwan VASP Association, addressed the situation, stating: “This time, a member of the preparatory group was involved in the investigation case. The preparatory group immediately held a meeting and issued a public response. The members involved in the case also took the initiative to suspend participation in the work of the preparatory group.”Business as usualIn an official statement, Bitgin confirmed Zhang’s association with the scandal and clarified that the ongoing investigation has not disrupted its operations. The exchange emphasized its commitment to cooperating with authorities, providing all necessary assistance to facilitate a smooth investigation process.The statement reads: “At present, Bitgin is fully cooperating with the investigating unit and actively providing all necessary assistance to ensure the smooth conduct of the investigation and hopes that the facts can be clarified as soon as possible.”Bitgin also confirmed that in light of the charges, the COO has ceased all communications with counterparties.Focus on regulationTaiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) outlined earlier this year its intention to restrict the activity of non-compliant offshore crypto exchanges. While cryptocurrency exchanges are not officially regulated yet, local operators have taken cues from the FSC to move towards self-regulation. A preparatory group was formed in September with Bitgin participating as a founding member.While Taiwan still doesn’t have a regulatory framework in place, it has applied anti-money laundering (AML) regulation to crypto businesses. In August, leading crypto exchange Binance initiated steps to register for AML compliance in Taiwan.Earlier this year, Taiwanese officials suggested that they would foster self-regulation while proposing the classification of crypto regulations within their own unique business category. Efforts were furthered last month when legislators introduced a cryptocurrency bill for its inaugural reading.JPEX falloutBeyond Bitgin, Taiwan is grappling with the fallout from wayward crypto exchange JPEX, which is accused of orchestrating Hong Kong’s largest financial scam. The authorities raided the local office of JPEX and identified suspects involved in the alleged fraud. To compound matters, local police also uncovered a $320 million crypto money laundering operation earlier this month.The incidents highlight the ongoing challenges faced by regulators in the region as they strive to protect investors from fraudulent activities.As the investigation unfolds, the Taiwanese cryptocurrency industry, along with its self-regulatory initiatives, remains under scrutiny, emphasizing the broader need for regulatory frameworks to safeguard the interests of investors and maintain the integrity of the market.

Late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob’s ‘Bull’ NFT on auction at OpenSeaNFT marketplace OpenSea is hosting an ongoing auction for a digital representation of the painting “Bull” by the late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob, Yonhap News TV reported on Tuesday. Celebrated for his distinctive lines in his paintings, Lee passed away in 1956. This auction is set to conclude on Dec. 12, with the starting bid placed at 300 WETH (Wrapped Ethereum), which is approximately equivalent to $626,000.Photo by Hans Eiskonen on UnsplashWhite bull as NFTLee’s “Bull,” featured in the OpenSea auction, is distinguished by its depiction of a white bull set against a dark green background. This particular piece is one of Lee’s unpublished works and is currently being offered for sale by a private art collector. Regarding the authenticity of the painting, the description on the OpenSea page states, “This work received a handwritten evaluation from Professor Jung Jum-sik, a founding member of the Lee Jung-seob Art Award, on November 9, 2000.”The current owner of the original artwork has expressed their intention for auctioning it as a desire to share a valuable piece of art. The painting originally belonged to poet Ku Sang and has since changed hands multiple times, experiencing some damage along the way. While the copyright for an artist’s work typically remains with their inheritors for 70 years posthumously, in the case of Lee Jung-seob, this period has already lapsed.Authenticity and NFT investmentsMeanwhile, art appraisal experts are advising caution, emphasizing the need to first confirm the authenticity of the original painting. This caution stems from the fact that the painting has not undergone evaluation by an official appraisal organization.During his interview with Yonhap, Jung Jun-mo, CEO of Korea Art Authentication Appraisal Inc., offered a word of caution regarding investment in NFTs tied to artworks with questionable authenticity. He emphasized that NFTs representing works that lack genuine authentication also hold no value in terms of authenticity. Jung advised potential investors to thoroughly verify the legitimacy of such artworks before proceeding with any investment in their NFT representations.Last year, many paintings of modern Korean artists were converted into NFTs, but they sparked controversy over issues of authenticity. Experts in art investment have since been advising thorough research prior to making any investments in these digital assets. They warn that losses incurred from transactions involving these NFTs fall squarely on the investors.