Vietnam’s Military Bank to launch the country’s first domestic crypto exchange

In a contrasting move to the recent approval of several spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), regulators in both Singapore and Thailand have turned down permission to list spot bitcoin ETFs.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashBitcoin not a qualified assetAccording to local news media on Wednesday, Singapore's Monetary Authority (MAS) has announced its decision not to permit the listing of spot ETFs in the country. The MAS argues that cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, do not meet the criteria for qualified assets within the context of ETFs. This regulatory divergence means that retail investors in Singapore won't see the introduction of spot bitcoin ETFs domestically. However, they still have an avenue to trade such ETFs as they can turn to local brokerages for access to overseas markets. Despite this allowance, the MAS emphasizes the need for these retail investors to exercise caution due to the inherent high volatility and speculative nature of cryptocurrency trading. A spokesperson from the regulatory authority clarified that while collected investment schemes (CIS), falling under the Securities and Futures Act regulation, include ETFs, they do not encompass bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency. Future potentialWhile MAS may be turning down spot bitcoin ETFs at this point, there’s potential for a change of heart in the future. The FIMA Bill is currently working its way through the city-state’s legislative process. If enacted, it would give broader regulatory oversight of crypto to MAS. Lasanka Perera, CEO of Independent Reserve Singapore, recently suggested that the bill could make an ETF more likely. Thailand says noMeanwhile, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stated that it currently does not plan to allow asset management firms to launch spot bitcoin ETFs in the country. Thai securities brokerage firms have been encouraging investors to consider investing directly in U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs. The Thai SEC clarified that while it closely monitors these developments, there is no immediate policy to allow spot bitcoin ETFs in Thailand. The regulator emphasizes that Thai investors can still engage in digital asset investments through domestic exchanges licensed by the SEC under the Digital Assets Decree. India, too, doesn’t appear to have been looking favorably on the potential for such products. The governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said last week that “the way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what.” Asian optimismIn the wake of ETF approval in the U.S., many industry commentators had suggested that Asia would respond positively. Australian venture capitalist Mark Carnegie has suggested that the developing bull market would be “an Asian story.” Yat Siu, co-founder of Hong Kong’s Animoca Brands, expressed the view that U.S. ETF approval would have a substantially positive impact within the Asian region. Hong Kong appears to be the most positive in the region in its outlook with regard to embracing spot bitcoin ETFs. Immediately following approval in the U.S., a Hong Kong legislator spoke out to encourage a proactive response relative to launch of similar products within the Chinese autonomous territory. Meanwhile, recent news reports indicate that spot bitcoin ETFs experienced substantial trading volume, accumulating $10 billion just three days after their approval in the U.S. 

South Korea is set to allow initial coin offerings (ICOs) next year, easing a ban on crypto fundraising that has been in place since 2017. A draft of the Digital Asset Basic Act, prepared by the Financial Services Commission, would allow domestic sales of digital assets if issuers meet disclosure requirements, the Maeil Business Newspaper reported. The measure is intended to address concerns about tokens that are initially listed on overseas exchanges before becoming available to South Korean investors. The legislation outlines tougher accountability standards for crypto issuers. Projects that provide false information or fail to disclose material details in their whitepapers ahead of an ICO could be held liable for investor losses. Liability would also extend to other parties substantially involved in an offering, including outsourced operators and market makers.Photo by Y K on UnsplashStablecoin issuers need Korean presenceSeparate provisions set out rules for stablecoins, barring tokens issued by entities without a physical presence in South Korea from domestic trading, a restriction that would apply to widely used stablecoins such as USDT and USDC. Issuers would be required to fully back stablecoins with reserves such as cash or government bonds held at banks or financial institutions and would be prohibited from paying interest to users. The proposal reflected the FSC’s position on the second phase of digital asset legislation focused on stablecoin issuers. The issue remains subject to inter-institutional debate, with the Bank of Korea pressing for a bank-led consortium model for stablecoin issuance. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) is expected to review a consolidated bill combining proposals from the government and the National Assembly next month, with plans to advance the legislation during the regular parliamentary session in the first quarter of 2026. The FSC’s focus on consumer protection is also reflected in its plans to introduce a Digital Finance Security Act, detailed in a recent report to the presidential office. According to Digital Asset, the proposed legislation would establish rules for traditional financial institutions as well as electronic financial businesses and virtual asset service providers. The move came after a 44.5 billion won ($30 million) hacking incident last month at Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange. Existing regulations under the Virtual Asset User Protection Act do not contain provisions specifically covering such cases. Separately, the FSC is working to strengthen its response to emerging forms of financial crime, including transnational offenses and crypto-enabled money laundering. It said measures under consideration included adding state-level criminal organizations to the list of entities barred from financial transactions, improving anti-money-laundering (AML) rules to better align with international standards, and expanding the scope of the travel rule. On the supervisory side, the commission intends to make the Virtual Asset Division a permanent unit after initially establishing it as a temporary body, News1 reported. The Virtual Asset Inspection Division within the Financial Intelligence Unit is also set to become a standing unit. Price declines weigh on exchangesThe stepped-up regulatory focus has coincided with a broader downturn in the crypto market. Bitcoin is trading below $89,000, about 30% below its all-time high of $126,000 set earlier in October. CoinGecko data cited by IT Chosun showed average daily trading volume across South Korean exchanges falling to $2.95 billion in November from $4.41 billion in August, with trading fees accounting for about 98% of exchange revenue. The broader market weakness has also been accompanied by declines in altcoins. South Korean crypto investors attributed the recent drop in altcoin prices to capital flowing into major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. A weekly survey conducted by CoinNess and Cratos showed that 41.7% of the 2,000 respondents cited capital concentration in leading tokens as the primary factor, followed by the growing number of altcoins at 31.6%, their limited practical value at 14.7%, and technical factors such as chart patterns at 12.1%. 

Indonesia witnessed a striking decline in cryptocurrency tax revenue for the year 2023, according to local media. 63% decreaseA report by Indonesian business and financial publication Kontan detailed a tax take drop to $31.7 million (Indonesian rupiah 467.27 billion). That tax collection is in sharp contrast to the partial collection period in 2022 when the crypto tax regime was initially introduced. It represents a drop of around 63%. The decline is part of a broader tax reform targeting the "digital economy" implemented in 2022, with the Indonesian government expressing the expectation that the reform would enhance tax collection, fostering a "healthy and fair taxation system."Photo by Nick Agus Arya on UnsplashDeclining transaction volumesDespite bitcoin's impressive surge of approximately 160% throughout 2023, the dip in crypto tax revenue was notable. The decrease is closely tied to a drop in transaction volumes over the same period compared to 2022. A report by CoinDesk Indonesia last week put that trading volume decrease at around 60%. Crypto transactions in Indonesia face dual taxation – a 0.1% income tax and a 0.11% value-added tax (VAT). Additionally, local crypto exchanges are subject to a special tax of approximately 0.04%, contributing to the national digital asset bourse. Disadvantaging local exchangesLocal exchanges in Indonesia, including prominent ones like Indodax, have voiced discontent with the high tax rates, contending that these levies are driving users towards unregulated offshore exchanges. Earlier this month Indodax CEO Oscar Darmawan called on the Indonesian government to review crypto tax rates. Darmawan highlighted that the cumulative taxes on crypto transactions often surpass the trading fees paid by users, posing a risk of users seeking more cost-effective alternatives. Local exchanges suggest that crypto transactions should only be subject to income tax, eliminating the VAT component. This proposal comes as Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK) prepares to implement cryptocurrency regulations in early 2025. The aim is to align the taxation of cryptocurrencies with their market nature, possibly redefining them more as securities than commodities. Inadequate tax regulation can lead to a decline in local market activities, potentially resulting in capital flight to more favorable jurisdictions. Indonesia's situation serves as a reminder of the crucial need for policies that understand and adapt to the dynamic nature of the cryptocurrency sector. India is being similarly challenged. Local exchanges there have also complained of punitive taxation, which resulted in Indian users migrating to offshore exchanges. That scenario led indigenous exchanges to lobby the government to take action. The authorities have duly acted, flagging a number of global exchanges for operating illegally within India. It’s not all bad news for the development of digital assets within Indonesia. The country still ranks highly in terms of crypto adoption within the Asian region. Crypto was also floated as an election issue recently by Gibran Rakabuming Raka, a vice-presidential candidate in the upcoming election. The politician expressed his commitment to accelerating the country's position as a leader in the digital revolution.